Nadine Bol
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 10
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 22
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 12
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 11
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 5
- Health top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
-
- Technology Use by Older Adults 13
-
- Media Influence and Health 9
-
- Privacy, Security, and Data Protection 6
- Co-authors
- Julia C.M. van WeertNatali HelbergerEllen M.A. SmetsEugène LoosSophie C. BoermanSanne KruikemeierMinh Hao NguyenEline Suzanne Smit
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (4 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Nadine Bol
58 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Applied Psychology 258
- General Health Professions 622
- Information Systems and Management 148
- Health 121
- Human-Computer Interaction 77
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Bol
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Bol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Bol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Bol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Bol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Bol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Bol. The network helps show where Nadine Bol may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadine Bol, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 114 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 64 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 19 |
About Nadine Bol
Nadine Bol is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (22 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (13 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (12 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (258 citations), General Health Professions (622 citations) and Information Systems and Management (148 citations). Nadine Bol has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Julia C.M. van Weert, Natali Helberger, Ellen M.A. Smets, Eugène Loos, Sophie C. Boerman, Sanne Kruikemeier, Minh Hao Nguyen, Eline Suzanne Smit, Andy J. King and Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.