Jan de Wit

1.6k total citations
68 papers, 809 citations indexed

About

Jan de Wit is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan de Wit has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 809 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 19 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 10 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Jan de Wit's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), AI in Service Interactions (12 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers). Jan de Wit is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), AI in Service Interactions (12 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers). Jan de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Iran and Sweden. Jan de Wit's co-authors include Paul Vogt, Emiel Krahmer, Willard W. Hartup, W. G. B. Huysmans, Willy Herroelen, Mirjam de Haas, Bram Willemsen, Alwin de Rooij, J.B. Schiere and H. van Keulen and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jan de Wit

64 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jan de Wit Netherlands 17 257 198 92 81 72 68 809
Marko Dragojević United States 17 153 0.6× 63 0.3× 22 0.2× 265 3.3× 46 0.6× 48 855
Wally Smith Australia 22 213 0.8× 97 0.5× 19 0.2× 390 4.8× 83 1.2× 88 1.4k
Gwen Nugent United States 17 81 0.3× 62 0.3× 46 0.5× 60 0.7× 242 3.4× 85 1.3k
Susannah B. F. Paletz United States 17 381 1.5× 112 0.6× 8 0.1× 176 2.2× 55 0.8× 42 867
Jing Tian China 12 52 0.2× 125 0.6× 14 0.2× 60 0.7× 58 0.8× 45 649
Susan Engel Australia 14 161 0.6× 51 0.3× 23 0.3× 168 2.1× 127 1.8× 52 769
Solon T. Kimball United States 9 159 0.6× 43 0.2× 40 0.4× 250 3.1× 30 0.4× 39 847
Yao Song China 17 183 0.7× 116 0.6× 8 0.1× 215 2.7× 16 0.2× 40 779
Mirko Farina Russia 17 125 0.5× 115 0.6× 11 0.1× 178 2.2× 59 0.8× 63 897
David Leiser Israel 20 162 0.6× 69 0.3× 10 0.1× 172 2.1× 200 2.8× 62 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan de Wit. The network helps show where Jan de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan de Wit. Jan de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rooij, Alwin de, et al.. (2024). Co-Creating with a Robot Facilitator: Robot Expressions Cause Mood Contagion Enhancing Collaboration, Satisfaction, and Performance. International Journal of Social Robotics. 16(11-12). 2133–2152. 3 indexed citations
2.
Bol, Nadine, et al.. (2024). Patient Perspectives on a Digital Assistant for Medication Reconciliation: An Interview Study Comparing Socioeconomic Groups. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 27(12). 865–872.
3.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2024). Exploring the Supportive Role of Artificial Intelligence in Participatory Design: A Systematic Review. Research portal (Tilburg University). 37–44. 4 indexed citations
4.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2024). Our Dialogue System Sucks - but Luckily we are at the Top of the Leaderboard!: A Discussion on Current Practices in NLP Evaluation. Research portal (Tilburg University). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
5.
Krahmer, Emiel, et al.. (2023). Plug and Play Conversations: The Micro-Conversation Scheme for Modular Development of Hybrid Conversational Agent. Pure Amsterdam UMC. 9. 50–55. 2 indexed citations
6.
Wit, Jan de, Nadine Bol, Wolfgang E. Ebbers, et al.. (2022). Predictors of contact tracing app adoption: Integrating the UTAUT, HBM and contextual factors. Technology in Society. 71. 102101–102101. 29 indexed citations
7.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2022). Electronic Brainstorming With a Chatbot Partner: A Good Idea Due to Increased Productivity and Idea Diversity. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 5. 880673–880673. 21 indexed citations
8.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2021). Brainstorming With a Social Robot Facilitator: Better Than Human Facilitation Due to Reduced Evaluation Apprehension?. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 8. 657291–657291. 10 indexed citations
9.
Oudgenoeg‐Paz, Ora, Josje Verhagen, Susanne Brouwer, et al.. (2021). Individual Differences in Children’s (Language) Learning Skills Moderate Effects of Robot-Assisted Second Language Learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 8. 676248–676248. 8 indexed citations
10.
Oudgenoeg‐Paz, Ora, Josje Verhagen, Paul Vogt, et al.. (2020). Teaching Turkish‐Dutch kindergartners Dutch vocabulary with a social robot: Does the robot's use of Turkish translations benefit children's Dutch vocabulary learning?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 37(3). 603–620. 19 indexed citations
11.
Haas, Mirjam de, Ora Oudgenoeg‐Paz, Emiel Krahmer, et al.. (2020). A toy or a friend? Children's anthropomorphic beliefs about robots and how these relate to second‐language word learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 37(2). 396–410. 34 indexed citations
12.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2020). Live Streams on Twitch Help Viewers Cope With Difficult Periods in Life. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 586975–586975. 41 indexed citations
13.
Wit, Jan de, Emiel Krahmer, & Paul Vogt. (2020). Introducing the NEMO-Lowlands iconic gesture dataset, collected through a gameful human–robot interaction. Behavior Research Methods. 53(3). 1353–1370. 4 indexed citations
14.
Wit, Jan de, Sigrid Pillen, Merel M. van Gilst, et al.. (2019). A Mobile App for Longterm Monitoring of Narcolepsy Symptoms: Design, Development, and Evaluation. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 8(1). e14939–e14939. 12 indexed citations
15.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2019). Why UX Research Matters for HRI: The Case of Tablets as Mediators. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
16.
Wit, Jan de, Thorsten Schodde, Bram Willemsen, et al.. (2017). Exploring the Effect of Gestures and Adaptive Tutoring on Children’s Comprehension of L2 Vocabularies. Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld). 4 indexed citations
17.
Eekeren, N.J.M. van, et al.. (2016). Inkomen 7.000 euro hoger bij betere bodemkwaliteit. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 13(6). 36–37. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (2015). Type of grass influences clover proportion and production of grass-clover leys.. 197–199. 1 indexed citations
19.
Jeuring, Johan, et al.. (2005). Generic Haskell User's Guide -- Version 1.42 (Coral). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
20.
Wit, Jan de, et al.. (1997). Animal manure: asset or liability?. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 88(1). 30–37. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026