Sanne Kruikemeier

5.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
77 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Sanne Kruikemeier is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Sanne Kruikemeier has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Communication, 46 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Sanne Kruikemeier's work include Social Media and Politics (53 papers), Media Studies and Communication (30 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (12 papers). Sanne Kruikemeier is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (53 papers), Media Studies and Communication (30 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (12 papers). Sanne Kruikemeier collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Germany. Sanne Kruikemeier's co-authors include Claes H. de Vreese, Sophie C. Boerman, Sophie Lecheler, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Natali Helberger, Theo Araujo, Rens Vliegenthart, Guda van Noort, Yael de Haan and Adam Shehata and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Computers in Human Behavior and Journal of Communication.

In The Last Decade

Sanne Kruikemeier

70 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

In AI we trust? Perceptio... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2020 2017 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sanne Kruikemeier Netherlands 29 1.8k 1.5k 543 440 365 77 3.3k
Natali Helberger Netherlands 32 2.1k 1.2× 1.2k 0.8× 970 1.8× 330 0.8× 825 2.3× 150 4.2k
Petter Bae Brandtzæg Norway 31 1.9k 1.1× 995 0.6× 1.4k 2.5× 138 0.3× 253 0.7× 72 3.9k
Eli Pariser United States 4 1.7k 1.0× 1.4k 0.9× 502 0.9× 295 0.7× 196 0.5× 4 3.2k
Seth C. Lewis United States 43 2.8k 1.6× 4.6k 3.0× 705 1.3× 320 0.7× 397 1.1× 110 6.6k
Philip M. Napoli United States 27 1.5k 0.8× 1.5k 1.0× 178 0.3× 294 0.7× 148 0.4× 113 2.8k
Tarleton Gillespie United States 23 2.0k 1.1× 1.4k 0.9× 933 1.7× 319 0.7× 327 0.9× 51 3.8k
Justin M. Rao United States 20 1.7k 0.9× 798 0.5× 362 0.7× 300 0.7× 632 1.7× 48 3.2k
Lee Rainie United States 25 1.8k 1.0× 1.4k 0.9× 253 0.5× 248 0.6× 66 0.2× 52 3.4k
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen United Kingdom 35 3.0k 1.7× 3.7k 2.4× 574 1.1× 585 1.3× 127 0.3× 125 5.2k
Mark Andrejevic Australia 26 1.7k 1.0× 745 0.5× 179 0.3× 255 0.6× 298 0.8× 104 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Sanne Kruikemeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sanne Kruikemeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanne Kruikemeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanne Kruikemeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sanne Kruikemeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanne Kruikemeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanne Kruikemeier. The network helps show where Sanne Kruikemeier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sanne Kruikemeier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sanne Kruikemeier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sanne Kruikemeier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sanne Kruikemeier. Sanne Kruikemeier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Lecheler, Sophie, et al.. (2024). Exploring digital campaign competence: the role of knowledge in data-driven election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 22(4). 463–478.
4.
Vliegenthart, Rens, Katharine Dommett, Rachel Gibson, et al.. (2024). Citizens’ Acceptance of Data-Driven Political Campaigning: A 25-Country Cross-National Vignette Study. Social Science Computer Review. 42(5). 1101–1119. 9 indexed citations
5.
Vliegenthart, Rens, Carolien van Ham, Sanne Kruikemeier, & Kristof Jacobs. (2024). A Matter of Misunderstanding? Explaining (Mis)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity across 25 Different Nations. Public Opinion Quarterly. 88(SI). 495–515. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lecheler, Sophie, et al.. (2024). Understanding Digital Campaign Competence: Conceptualizing Data-Driven Political Advertising Literacy. Mass Communication & Society. 28(5). 852–878. 4 indexed citations
8.
Otto, Lukas, et al.. (2023). On or off topic? Understanding the effects of issue-related political targeted ads. Information Communication & Society. 27(7). 1378–1404. 3 indexed citations
9.
Vermeer, Susan, et al.. (2023). Instaworthy? Examining the Effects of (Targeted) Civic Education Ads on Instagram. Media and Communication. 11(3). 1 indexed citations
10.
Matthes, Jörg, Marlis Stubenvoll, Alice Binder, et al.. (2022). Understanding the democratic role of perceived online political micro-targeting: longitudinal effects on trust in democracy and political interest. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 19(4). 435–448. 20 indexed citations
11.
Ohme, Jakob, et al.. (2022). Avoiding the news to participate in society? The longitudinal relationship between news avoidance and civic engagement. Communications. 48(4). 551–562. 12 indexed citations
12.
Kefford, Glenn, Katharine Dommett, Jessica Baldwin-Philippi, et al.. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics. 29(3). 448–462. 36 indexed citations
13.
Boerman, Sophie C., Sanne Kruikemeier, & Nadine Bol. (2021). When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 4. 100144–100144. 31 indexed citations
14.
Shehata, Adam, et al.. (2021). Conceptualizing long-term media effects on societal beliefs. Annals of the International Communication Association. 45(1). 75–93. 28 indexed citations
15.
Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen, Tom Dobber, Sanne Kruikemeier, et al.. (2019). Online politieke microtargeting: Een zegen of een vloek voor de democratie?. Nederlandsch juristenblad. 94(10). 662–669.
16.
Kruikemeier, Sanne, Katjana Gattermann, & Rens Vliegenthart. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of politicians' visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society. 34(4). 215–228. 41 indexed citations
17.
Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen, Judith Möller, Sanne Kruikemeier, et al.. (2018). Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy. Utrecht Law Review. 14(1). 82–82. 161 indexed citations
18.
Leuven, Sarah Van, Sanne Kruikemeier, Sophie Lecheler, & Liesbeth Hermans. (2018). Online And Newsworthy. Digital Journalism. 6(7). 798–806. 36 indexed citations
19.
Boerman, Sophie C., Sanne Kruikemeier, & Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius. (2017). Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Advertising. 46(3). 363–376. 304 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Aléncar, Amanda & Sanne Kruikemeier. (2016). Audiovisual infotainment in European news: A comparative content analysis of Dutch, Spanish, and Irish television news programs. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026