Naama Katzin
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Avishai HenikTali LeibovichMoti SaltiDavid KatzinDavid Α. RosenbaumMarius UsherAdi RosénNoam Weinbach
- Topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers)Mathematics Education and Pedagogy (3 papers)
- Journals
- CognitionBehavioral and Brain SciencesJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
- Partner nations
- IsraelCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Naama Katzin
7 papers receiving 374 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Statistics and Probability 341
- Education 221
- Cognitive Neuroscience 157
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 124
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Naama Katzin
This map shows the geographic impact of Naama Katzin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naama Katzin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naama Katzin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naama Katzin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naama Katzin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naama Katzin. The network helps show where Naama Katzin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naama Katzin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naama Katzin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naama Katzin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naama Katzin. Naama Katzin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognitionbreakdown → | 315 |
| 8 | 5 |
About Naama Katzin
Naama Katzin is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Applied Mathematics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers) and Mathematics Education and Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (341 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations). Naama Katzin has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Avishai Henik, Tali Leibovich, Moti Salti, David Katzin, David Α. Rosenbaum, Marius Usher, Adi Rosén and Noam Weinbach. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.