Andrew Blackmore

435 total citations
32 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

Andrew Blackmore is a scholar working on Law, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Blackmore has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Law, 9 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 8 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Blackmore's work include Legal Issues in South Africa (12 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (6 papers). Andrew Blackmore is often cited by papers focused on Legal Issues in South Africa (12 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (6 papers). Andrew Blackmore collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, Netherlands and Australia. Andrew Blackmore's co-authors include M.T. Mentis, Robert J. Scholes, Arie Trouwborst, Rob Slotow, Margaret H. Friedel, Jeanetta Selier, Lindy J. Thompson, Adrian J. Armstrong, Alan Seal and Michelle Henley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Biogeography and Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Blackmore

28 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Blackmore South Africa 8 116 81 70 59 35 32 253
Yuri Botelho Salmona Brazil 5 109 0.9× 85 1.0× 34 0.5× 142 2.4× 32 0.9× 5 318
Theodore P. Toombs United States 13 191 1.6× 81 1.0× 112 1.6× 142 2.4× 13 0.4× 19 358
M. Arjunan India 7 106 0.9× 61 0.8× 73 1.0× 191 3.2× 37 1.1× 10 338
Richard G. Jefferson United Kingdom 9 153 1.3× 180 2.2× 75 1.1× 82 1.4× 101 2.9× 13 330
Rita de Cássia Quitete Portela Brazil 10 82 0.7× 155 1.9× 20 0.3× 118 2.0× 63 1.8× 30 354
Alex Verlinden Belgium 12 215 1.9× 95 1.2× 127 1.8× 78 1.3× 44 1.3× 16 349
Sophie J. Williams United Kingdom 11 87 0.8× 53 0.7× 69 1.0× 62 1.1× 45 1.3× 14 315
Payal Bal Australia 12 165 1.4× 83 1.0× 76 1.1× 160 2.7× 38 1.1× 18 401
Sidi Imad Cherkaoui Morocco 11 200 1.7× 77 1.0× 18 0.3× 71 1.2× 35 1.0× 25 312
Naing Zaw Htun Japan 11 153 1.3× 71 0.9× 52 0.7× 262 4.4× 18 0.5× 11 395

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Blackmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Blackmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Blackmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Blackmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Blackmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Blackmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Blackmore. The network helps show where Andrew Blackmore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Blackmore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Blackmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Blackmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Blackmore. Andrew Blackmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Brien, Gordon, et al.. (2024). If a fish comes out of the river and speaks, we should believe it: South African perspective on fish kills. River Research and Applications. 41(2). 426–447.
2.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2022). To be or not to be a protected area: A perverse political threat. Bothalia. 52(1). 2 indexed citations
3.
Slotow, Rob, et al.. (2021). Could Culling of Elephants Be Considered Inhumane and Illegal in South African Law?. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. 24(3-4). 181–206. 10 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, Lindy J. & Andrew Blackmore. (2020). A brief review of the legal protection of vultures in South Africa. Ostrich. 91(1). 1–12. 12 indexed citations
6.
Blackmore, Andrew, et al.. (2019). A Hitchhiker’s Guide to South Africa’s Wetland Legislative Framework and International Obligations. 2019(1). 42–72. 2 indexed citations
7.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2019). Towards Unpacking the Theory Behind, and a Pragmatic Approach to Biodiversity Offsets. Environmental Management. 65(1). 88–97. 2 indexed citations
8.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2018). The rediscovery of the trusteeship doctrine in South African environmental law and its significance in conserving biodiversity in South Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2018). The Application of and the Prospects for the Public Trust Doctrine in South Africa: A Brief Overview. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
10.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2018). Getting to grips with the public trust doctrine in biodiversity conservation: A brief overview. Bothalia. 48(1). 5 indexed citations
11.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2018). Rediscovering the origins and inclusion of the public trust doctrine in South African environmental law: A speculative analysis. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law. 27(2). 187–198. 4 indexed citations
12.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2017). Public trust doctrine, research and responsible wildlife management in South Africa. Bothalia. 47(2). 6 indexed citations
14.
Armstrong, Adrian J. & Andrew Blackmore. (2017). Tsetse flies should remain in protected areas in KwaZulu-Natal. Koedoe. 59(1). 5 indexed citations
15.
Seal, Alan, et al.. (2016). The effect of pollen donor on fruit weight, seed weight and red colour development in Actinidia chinensis ‘Hort22D’. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 44(1). 1–12. 16 indexed citations
16.
Selier, Jeanetta, Rob Slotow, Andrew Blackmore, & Arie Trouwborst. (2016). The Legal Challenges of Transboundary Wildlife Management at the Population Level: The Case of a Trilateral Elephant Population in Southern Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
17.
Selier, Jeanetta, Rob Slotow, Andrew Blackmore, & Arie Trouwborst. (2016). The Legal Challenges of Transboundary Wildlife Management at the Population Level: The Case of a Trilateral Elephant Population in Southern Africa. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. 19(2). 101–135. 25 indexed citations
18.
Blackmore, Andrew. (2014). The Interplay between the Public Trust Doctrine and Biodiversity and Cultural Resource Legislation in South Africa: The Case of the Shembe Church Worship Site in Tembe Elephant Park in KwaZulu-Natal. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
19.
Blackmore, Andrew, M.T. Mentis, & Robert J. Scholes. (1990). The Origin and Extent of Nutrient-Enriched Patches within a Nutrient-Poor Savanna in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography. 17(4/5). 463–463. 92 indexed citations
20.
Friedel, Margaret H. & Andrew Blackmore. (1988). The development of veld assessment in the northern Transvaal savanna I. Red Turfveld. Journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa. 5(1). 26–37. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026