Mona Guath

467 total citations
20 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Mona Guath is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Mona Guath has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Mona Guath's work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers). Mona Guath is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers). Mona Guath collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Hungary. Mona Guath's co-authors include Thomas Nygren, Peter Juslin, Divina Frau‐Meigs, Marko Turpeinen, Ola Eriksson, Anna Björklund, Jan‐Olov Sundqvist, Åsa Svenfelt, Johan Sundberg and Patrik Söderholm and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Mona Guath

20 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mona Guath Sweden	8	136	77	68	43	42	20	293
Christopher Clarke United Kingdom	3	46 0.3×	128 1.7×	9 0.1×	30 0.7×	49 1.2×	3	308
Chun‐Yi Lin Taiwan	9	33 0.2×	116 1.5×	18 0.3×	135 3.1×	7 0.2×	15	322
Tania Ouariachi Spain	10	150 1.1×	52 0.7×	18 0.3×	162 3.8×	4 0.1×	24	366
Xiangming Li China	14	27 0.2×	68 0.9×	8 0.1×	50 1.2×	13 0.3×	32	495
Nicole Weber United States	11	72 0.5×	270 3.5×	14 0.2×	87 2.0×	10 0.2×	21	564
Sungwon Chung United States	10	111 0.8×	40 0.5×	40 0.6×	76 1.8×		15	383
Charles Kostelnick United States	12	45 0.3×	40 0.5×	61 0.9×	23 0.5×	2 0.0×	22	421
Kate Hennessy Canada	13	73 0.5×	17 0.2×	7 0.1×	10 0.2×	6 0.1×	45	408
Marta Royo Spain	9	14 0.1×	86 1.1×	12 0.2×	11 0.3×	9 0.2×	31	282
Harold G. Nelson United States	7	75 0.6×	63 0.8×	17 0.3×	34 0.8×		13	404

Countries citing papers authored by Mona Guath

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Guath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Guath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Guath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Guath

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Guath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Guath. The network helps show where Mona Guath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mona Guath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mona Guath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mona Guath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mona Guath. Mona Guath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kleberg, Johan Lundin, et al.. (2023). Social feedback enhances learning in Williams syndrome. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 164–164. 6 indexed citations

Guath, Mona, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Ján Weis, et al.. (2022). Pupil dilation during negative prediction errors is related to brain choline concentration and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Behavioural Brain Research. 436. 114060–114060. 5 indexed citations

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2022). Pupillary response in reward processing in adults with major depressive disorder in remission. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 29(3). 306–315. 7 indexed citations

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2022). Nudging for eco-friendly online shopping – Attraction effect curbs price sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 81. 101821–101821. 13 indexed citations

Guath, Mona & Thomas Nygren. (2022). Civic Online Reasoning Among Adults: An Empirical Evaluation of a Prescriptive Theory and Its Correlates. Frontiers in Education. 7. 5 indexed citations

Nygren, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Combatting Visual Fake News with a Professional Fact-Checking Tool in Education in France, Romania, Spain and Sweden. Information. 12(5). 201–201. 26 indexed citations

Nygren, Thomas & Mona Guath. (2021). Students Evaluating and Corroborating Digital News. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 66(4). 549–565. 26 indexed citations

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2021). Learning How to Separate Fake from Real News: Scalable Digital Tutorials Promoting Students’ Civic Online Reasoning. Future Internet. 13(3). 60–60. 27 indexed citations

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2021). Why do people pursue goals sequentially when they try to balance cost and utility?. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 33(8). 931–950. 2 indexed citations

10.

Nygren, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Hur motiverar gymnasieelever sina bedömningar av trovärdiga och vilseledande digitala nyheter. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 10(2). 153–178. 3 indexed citations

11.

Nygren, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Global Citizenship Education for Global Citizenship?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 19(4). 63–97. 7 indexed citations

12.

Nygren, Thomas & Mona Guath. (2019). Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility. Nordicom review/NORDICOM review. 40(1). 23–42. 75 indexed citations

13.

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2018). Memory and decision making: Effects of sequential presentation of probabilities and outcomes in risky prospects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 148(2). 304–324. 4 indexed citations

14.

Nygren, Thomas & Mona Guath. (2018). Mixed Digital Messages: The Ability to Determine News Credibility among Swedish Teenagers.. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 15. 375–378. 3 indexed citations

15.

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2015). Optimizing electricity consumption: A case of function learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 21(4). 326–341. 4 indexed citations

16.

Juslin, Peter, et al.. (2015). Sequential and myopic: On the use of feedback to balance cost and utility in a simulated electricity efficiency task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 28(1). 106–128. 3 indexed citations

17.

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2013). Is feedforward learning more efficient than feedback learning in smart meters of electricity consumption. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 35(35). 1 indexed citations

18.

Finnveden, Göran, Tomas Ekvall, Yevgeniya Arushanyan, et al.. (2013). Policy Instruments towards a Sustainable Waste Management. Sustainability. 5(3). 841–881. 59 indexed citations

19.

Guath, Mona, et al.. (2011). Kilograms or cups of tea: Comparing footprints for better CO 2 understanding. 9(1). 43–54. 15 indexed citations

20.

Borgstede, Chris von, et al.. (2011). Hållbar avfallshantering: utvärdering av styrmedel från ett psykologiskt och etnologiskt perspektiv. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact