Andreas Frick

3.4k citations
113 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Frick

107 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Andreas Frick
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 227
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 575
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 802
  • Biological Psychiatry 66
  • Applied Psychology 71
Replace Jee In Kang with:
Jee In Kang South Korea
Oezguer A. Onur Germany
Robert N. McLay United States
Sonja Schöning Germany
Gen Komaki Japan
Kristen C. Klemenhagen United States
Zsófia Nemoda Hungary
Rudie Kortekaas Netherlands
Xiongzhao Zhu China
Brant P. Hasler United States
Andreas Frick relative to Jee In Kang South Korea Jee In Kang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jee In Kang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Frick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Frick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Frick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Frick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Frick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Frick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Frick. The network helps show where Andreas Frick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Frick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Frick Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Frick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012259
2 2015117
3 2012116
4 201591
5 200890
6 201377
7 201675
8 201372
9 201660
10 201354
11 201351
12 201550
13 201749
14 200449
15 199946
16 201940
17 201438
18 202136
19 202035
20 201634

About Andreas Frick

Andreas Frick is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (26 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (17 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (13 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (227 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (575 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (802 citations), Biological Psychiatry (66 citations) and Applied Psychology (71 citations). Andreas Frick has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tomas Furmark, Mats Fredrikson, Jonas Engman, Johannes Björkstrand, Elna‐Marie Larsson, Thomas Ågren, Kristoffer Månsson, Malin Gingnell, Per Carlbring and R. G. H. Baumeister. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Handchirurgie · Mikrochirurgie · Plastische Chirurgie, Behavioural Brain Research, Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine and Molecular Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact