Molly Hite
Impact in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Short Stories in Global Literature
- Themes in Literature Analysis
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Cultural Studies top 5%
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 6
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 4
- Short Stories in Global Literature 3
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 1
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Rachel Blau DuPlessisSusan S. LanserPaige J. NovakTimothy M. LaParaTaegyu KimClaudia TateEllen E. BerryNancy A. Walker
- Journals
- Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (4 papers)NOVEL A Forum on Fiction (4 papers)SubStance (3 papers)Twentieth Century Literature (2 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Molly Hite
17 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Literature and Literary Theory 218
- Cultural Studies 41
- Gender Studies 46
- History 49
- Philosophy 43
Countries citing papers authored by Molly Hite
This map shows the geographic impact of Molly Hite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molly Hite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molly Hite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Molly Hite
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Molly Hite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Molly Hite. The network helps show where Molly Hite may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Molly Hite, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 5 | We Think Back Through Carolyn Heilbrun If We Are Women | 2005 | 0 |
| 6 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 13 | The other side of the story | 1989 | 3 |
| 14 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 215 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 33 |
About Molly Hite
Molly Hite is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (1 paper), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper) and German History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (218 citations), Cultural Studies (41 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations), History (49 citations) and Philosophy (43 citations). Molly Hite has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Blau DuPlessis, Susan S. Lanser, Paige J. Novak, Timothy M. LaPara, Taegyu Kim, Claudia Tate, Ellen E. Berry, Nancy A. Walker, Patricia Waugh and Andrew C. Ross. Their work appears in journals such as Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, SubStance, Twentieth Century Literature and The Science of The Total Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.