Julia Emberley
Impact in
Papers in ⓘ
-
- South African History and Culture 1
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 1
- Race, History, and American Society 1
- Health 3
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights 3
- Co-authors
- Donna Landry (1 shared paper)Bob Hodge (1 shared paper)V. Mishra (1 shared paper)Graham Huggan (1 shared paper)Rosanne Kennedy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- English studies in Canada (2 papers)Signs (1 paper)Journal of Visual Culture (1 paper)Modern fiction studies (1 paper)Fashion Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Julia Emberley
18 papers receiving 108 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Health 59
- Museology 16
- Literature and Literary Theory 30
- Cultural Studies 22
- Sociology and Political Science 112
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Emberley
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Emberley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Emberley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Emberley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Emberley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Emberley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Emberley. The network helps show where Julia Emberley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Julia Emberley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enough is Enough: Aboriginal Women Speak Out | 1988 | 71 |
| 2 | Thresholds of Difference: Feminist Critique, Native Women's Writings, Postcolonial Theory | 1993 | 41 |
| 3 | The cultural politics of fur | 1997 | 18 |
| 4 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 5 | Venus and Furs: The Cultural Politics of Fur | 1998 | 12 |
| 6 | The Testimonial Uncanny: Indigenous Storytelling, Knowledge, and Reparative Practices | 2014 | 11 |
| 7 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 1 |
About Julia Emberley
Julia Emberley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Gender Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (1 paper), South African History and Culture (1 paper), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper) and Race, History, and American Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (59 citations), Museology (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (30 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (112 citations). Julia Emberley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donna Landry, Bob Hodge, V. Mishra, Graham Huggan and Rosanne Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as English studies in Canada, Signs, Journal of Visual Culture, Modern fiction studies and Fashion Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.