M.L.J. Crawford
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Co-authors
- Gunter K. von NoordenEarl L. SmithRonald S. HarwerthLouvenia Carter‐DawsonFran ShenLi‐Fang HungEarl SmithSteven J. Cool
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (52 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (27 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
M.L.J. Crawford
69 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Ophthalmology 1.8k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
- Epidemiology 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 930
Countries citing papers authored by M.L.J. Crawford
This map shows the geographic impact of M.L.J. Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.L.J. Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.L.J. Crawford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.L.J. Crawford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.L.J. Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.L.J. Crawford. The network helps show where M.L.J. Crawford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.L.J. Crawford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.L.J. Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.L.J. Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.L.J. Crawford. M.L.J. Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 143 | |
| 3 | Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. | 399 |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 363 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | The lateral geniculate nucleus in human strabismic amblyopia. | 99 |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 92 | |
| 19 | Failure to preserve cortical binocularity in strabismic monkeys raised in a unidirectional visual environment. | 6 |
| 20 | Optically induced concomitant strabismus in monkeys. | 80 |
About M.L.J. Crawford
M.L.J. Crawford is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (52 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (27 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (930 citations). M.L.J. Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gunter K. von Noorden, Earl L. Smith, Ronald S. Harwerth, Louvenia Carter‐Dawson, Fran Shen, Li‐Fang Hung, Earl Smith, Steven J. Cool, Randolph Blake and Laura J. Frishman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.