This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Maddess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Maddess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Maddess more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Maddess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Maddess. The network helps show where Ted Maddess may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted Maddess
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted Maddess.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted Maddess based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ted Maddess. Ted Maddess is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carle, Corinne F., et al.. (2021). Diagnostic power of rapid objective visual testing of multiple sclerosis patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 2420–2420.2 indexed citations
6.
Essex, Rohan W., et al.. (2021). Per-region visual field sensitivities and delays in AMD. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 317–317.2 indexed citations
7.
Maddess, Ted, et al.. (2021). Diagnostic power of rapid ETDRS-grid matched objective perimetry in early- to late-stage AMD. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 316–316.5 indexed citations
8.
Carle, Corinne F., et al.. (2019). Macular and Wide field eighty second screening tests using multifocal pupil perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 2294–2294.1 indexed citations
Sabeti, Faran, et al.. (2015). A comparative analysis of changes in visual field sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 4685–4685.1 indexed citations
Sabeti, Faran, Ted Maddess, & Andrew C. James. (2010). Dichoptic Multifocal Pupillography Identifies Retinal Dysfunction in Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 2794–2794.2 indexed citations
14.
Maddess, Ted, Corinne F. Carle, Maria Kolic, Rohan W. Essex, & Andrew C. James. (2010). Diagnostic Power and Reproducibility of Multifocal Pupillographic Perimetry in Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 5505–5505.1 indexed citations
15.
Maddess, Ted, et al.. (2009). Pattern-pulsed MfVEP waveform of age-related macular degeneration patients. ASM Science Journal.1 indexed citations
16.
Kolic, Maria, Ted Maddess, Rohan W. Essex, & Andrew C. James. (2009). Attempting Balanced Multifocal Pupillographic Perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5280–5280.4 indexed citations
James, Andrew C., et al.. (2004). Comparison of Contrast Reversing and Pattern–Pulse Stimulation for Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5485–5485.1 indexed citations
19.
Maddess, Ted, Andrew C. James, Rasa Ruseckaite, & Elizabeth A. Bowman. (2003). Hierarchical Decomposition of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential Responses to Dichoptic Contrast Reversing and Temporally Sparse Stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 4198–4198.1 indexed citations
20.
Maddess, Ted, et al.. (1997). Temporal analysis of the Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet effect. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 38(4). 2127–2127.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.