Steven J. Cool

568 total citations
11 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

Steven J. Cool is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven J. Cool has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Steven J. Cool's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). Steven J. Cool is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). Steven J. Cool collaborates with scholars based in United States. Steven J. Cool's co-authors include Earl Smith, M.L.J. Crawford, Randolph Blake, Gunter K. von Noorden, Ajay Ghosh and Bradley Coffey and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Vision Research and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

Steven J. Cool

10 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steven J. Cool United States	7	314	166	156	84	82	11	454
P. G. H. Clarke United Kingdom	11	365 1.2×	163 1.0×	171 1.1×	59 0.7×	34 0.4×	11	539
Dean Yager United States	16	389 1.2×	124 0.7×	96 0.6×	72 0.9×	86 1.0×	44	594
Yves Le Grand France	6	220 0.7×	83 0.5×	58 0.4×	82 1.0×	56 0.7×	14	373
Antti Raninen Finland	13	415 1.3×	94 0.6×	58 0.4×	96 1.1×	93 1.1×	20	502
Howard D. Baker United States	13	378 1.2×	168 1.0×	106 0.7×	143 1.7×	46 0.6×	25	593
R.G. Erickson United States	11	789 2.5×	262 1.6×	247 1.6×	142 1.7×	64 0.8×	11	895
David M. Regal United States	7	352 1.1×	91 0.5×	52 0.3×	44 0.5×	136 1.7×	8	470
Lawrence P. O’Keefe United States	10	770 2.5×	208 1.3×	219 1.4×	144 1.7×	241 2.9×	15	918
Leisa M. Schmid Australia	11	347 1.1×	160 1.0×	134 0.9×	48 0.6×	24 0.3×	20	456
T. Nikara Japan	5	1.1k 3.4×	322 1.9×	483 3.1×	154 1.8×	119 1.5×	14	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Steven J. Cool

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven J. Cool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven J. Cool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven J. Cool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven J. Cool

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven J. Cool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven J. Cool. The network helps show where Steven J. Cool may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven J. Cool

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven J. Cool. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven J. Cool based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven J. Cool. Steven J. Cool is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Coffey, Bradley, et al.. (1988). Comparison of Snellen letter and Vistech grating charts as refraction targets.. PubMed. 59(5). 364–71. 2 indexed citations

2.

Cool, Steven J., Earl Smith, & Ajay Ghosh. (1979). Frontiers in Visual Science. Journal of Optics. 8(4). 105–105. 56 indexed citations

3.

Cool, Steven J., et al.. (1978). Frontiers in visual science : proceedings of the University of Houston College of Optometry dedication symposium, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., March, 1977. Springer eBooks. 1 indexed citations

4.

Cool, Steven J. & Earl Smith. (1978). Frontiers in Visual Science. Springer series in optical sciences. 143 indexed citations

5.

Crawford, M.L.J., Randolph Blake, Steven J. Cool, & Gunter K. von Noorden. (1975). Physiological consequences of unilateral and bilateral eye closure in macaque monkeys: some further observations. Brain Research. 84(1). 150–154. 84 indexed citations

6.

Blake, Randolph, Steven J. Cool, & M.L.J. Crawford. (1974). Visual resolution in the cat. Vision Research. 14(11). 1211–1217. 112 indexed citations

7.

Cool, Steven J. & M.L.J. Crawford. (1972). Absence of binocular coding in striate cortex units of Siamese cats. Vision Research. 12(11). 1809–IN5. 32 indexed citations

8.

Cool, Steven J.. (1971). Binocular depth perception and the corpus callosum. Vision Research. 11(7). 755–756. 2 indexed citations

9.

Crawford, M.L.J. & Steven J. Cool. (1970). Binocular stimulation and response variability of striate cortex units in the cat. Vision Research. 10(11). 1145–1153. 12 indexed citations

10.

Cool, Steven J., et al.. (1970). Tungsten Microelectrode Preparations for CNS Recording. Review of Scientific Instruments. 41(10). 1506–1507. 6 indexed citations

11.

Cool, Steven J.. (1966). Some Effects of Early Visual Environments on Adult Discrimination Abilities in the Rat. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact