Mitchell G. Ash

3.7k citations
76 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell G. Ash

65 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

Mitchell G. Ash
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • General Psychology 336
  • History and Philosophy of Science 210
  • History 138
  • Social Psychology 258
  • General Decision Sciences 20
Replace Sidney Hook with:
Sidney Hook United States
David Hiley United States
Richard Wollheim United States
Alan C. Elms United States
Joseph Margolis United States
Philip P. Wiener United States
Gary Hatfield United States
Henri Bergson Canada
John Cottingham United Kingdom
Augustine Brannigan Canada
Mitchell G. Ash relative to Sidney Hook United States Sidney Hook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Sidney Hook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell G. Ash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell G. Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell G. Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell G. Ash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell G. Ash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell G. Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell G. Ash. The network helps show where Mitchell G. Ash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell G. Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell G. Ash Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell G. Ash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity.
1995162
2
The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought
1982155
3 1991103
4 199093
5
Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890-1967
199585
6 200663
7 199661
8 199237
9 200626
10 200926
11 198026
12 198224
13 200522
14 201222
15 199221
16 199719
17
Mythos Humboldt : Vergangenheit und Zukunft der deutschen Universitäten
199917
18 199211
19 201911
20 202110

About Mitchell G. Ash

Mitchell G. Ash is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (20 papers), German Social Sciences and History (12 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), History of Science and Natural History (9 papers), European history and politics (8 papers), Social Representations and Identity (8 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (7 papers) and Medical History and Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (336 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (210 citations), History (138 citations), Social Psychology (258 citations) and General Decision Sciences (20 citations). Mitchell G. Ash has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include William R. Woodward, Thomas Sturm, Axel Honneth, Alfons Söllner, Peter I. Rose, Christian Fleck, Ulfried Geuter, Hannah S. Decker, Jochen Gläser and Grit Laudel. Their work appears in journals such as Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, The American Historical Review, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Isis and American Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact