Hannah S. Decker

1.2k citations
28 papers · 590 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (9 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Hannah S. Decker

19 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Hannah S. Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Clinical Psychology 250
  • Physiology 144
  • Philosophy 141
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 94
  • Molecular Biology 75
Replace Richard Noll with:
Richard Noll United States
Emil Kraepelin Brazil
Deborah J. Coon United States
Eric J. Engstrom Germany
William A. Frosch United States
George G. Haydu United States
T. E. Weckowicz Canada
Alfred Gallinek United States
Rachel Cooper United Kingdom
Philip Gerrans Australia
Hannah S. Decker relative to Richard Noll United States Richard Noll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Richard Noll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah S. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah S. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah S. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah S. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah S. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah S. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah S. Decker. The network helps show where Hannah S. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah S. Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah S. Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah S. Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah S. Decker. Hannah S. Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4
The Making of DSM-III®: A Diagnostic Manual's Conquest of American Psychiatry
53
5 177
6 55
7 25
8 15
9 2
10 4
11 0
12 12
13 45
14 0
15
Freud, Dora, and Vienna 1900
26
16 0
17 1
18 4
19 7
20 6

About Hannah S. Decker

Hannah S. Decker is a scholar working on General Psychology, Philosophy and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (9 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (75 citations), Philosophy (141 citations) and Clinical Psychology (250 citations). Hannah S. Decker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Romania and Canada. Frequent co-authors include K.Y. Lo, Sérgio T. Ferreira, Michael Silverman, Martin A. Miller, Zvi Lothane, Richard Noll, Mitchell G. Ash and Ulfried Geuter. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Neuroscience and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026