Claudette Pretorius

849 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Claudette Pretorius is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Claudette Pretorius has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Claudette Pretorius's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers). Claudette Pretorius is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers). Claudette Pretorius collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Namibia and United Kingdom. Claudette Pretorius's co-authors include David Coyle, Derek Chambers, Darragh McCashin, Benjamin R. Cowan, Trish Gorely and Stephen J Leslie and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Human-Computer Interaction and JMIR Mental Health.

In The Last Decade

Claudette Pretorius

9 papers receiving 454 citations

Hit Papers

Young People’s Online Help-Seeking and Mental Health Diff... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Claudette Pretorius Ireland 6 231 191 175 126 101 9 469
Shaun Liverpool United Kingdom 8 267 1.2× 132 0.7× 221 1.3× 87 0.7× 136 1.3× 31 481
Helena Jeriček Klanšček Slovenia 7 73 0.3× 247 1.3× 150 0.9× 86 0.7× 54 0.5× 18 439
Elaine Hewis United Kingdom 10 128 0.6× 122 0.6× 180 1.0× 85 0.7× 164 1.6× 11 427
William Bart Collins United States 8 74 0.3× 102 0.5× 207 1.2× 123 1.0× 190 1.9× 8 495
Sarah Gillespie United States 12 91 0.4× 225 1.2× 294 1.7× 97 0.8× 77 0.8× 32 514
Lee Valentine Australia 12 332 1.4× 146 0.8× 169 1.0× 129 1.0× 114 1.1× 34 532
Nelli Lyyra Finland 11 47 0.2× 165 0.9× 175 1.0× 110 0.9× 88 0.9× 30 455
Fam te Poel Netherlands 9 105 0.5× 133 0.7× 69 0.4× 35 0.3× 116 1.1× 11 416
Sandra Arnáez Spain 10 67 0.3× 136 0.7× 255 1.5× 71 0.6× 107 1.1× 29 522
Daniel T. Ragan United States 12 52 0.2× 208 1.1× 161 0.9× 101 0.8× 135 1.3× 16 489

Countries citing papers authored by Claudette Pretorius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudette Pretorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudette Pretorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudette Pretorius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudette Pretorius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudette Pretorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudette Pretorius. The network helps show where Claudette Pretorius may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudette Pretorius

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudette Pretorius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudette Pretorius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudette Pretorius. Claudette Pretorius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Pretorius, Claudette, Darragh McCashin, & David Coyle. (2022). Mental health professionals as influencers on TikTok and Instagram: What role do they play in mental health literacy and help-seeking?. Internet Interventions. 30. 100591–100591. 52 indexed citations
2.
Pretorius, Claudette, Darragh McCashin, & David Coyle. (2022). Supporting personal preferences and different levels of need in online help-seeking: a comparative study of help-seeking technologies for mental health. Human-Computer Interaction. 39(5-6). 288–309. 5 indexed citations
3.
Pretorius, Claudette, et al.. (2021). Transitions in Technology-Mediated Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-management: Qualitative Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework. JMIR Cardio. 5(2). e30428–e30428. 7 indexed citations
4.
Pretorius, Claudette & David Coyle. (2021). Young People's Use of Digital Tools to Support Their Mental Health During Covid-19 Restrictions. Frontiers in Digital Health. 3. 763876–763876. 24 indexed citations
6.
Pretorius, Claudette, et al.. (2020). Searching for Mental Health: A Mixed-Methods Study of Young People's Online Help-seeking. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin). 1–13. 32 indexed citations
7.
Pretorius, Claudette, Derek Chambers, & David Coyle. (2019). Young People’s Online Help-Seeking and Mental Health Difficulties: Systematic Narrative Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(11). e13873–e13873. 271 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Pretorius, Claudette, Derek Chambers, Benjamin R. Cowan, & David Coyle. (2019). Young People Seeking Help Online for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Mental Health. 6(8). e13524–e13524. 76 indexed citations
9.
Pretorius, Claudette, David Coyle, & Derek Chambers. (2018). Intelligent techniques to support online mental health communities. 1–4. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026