Mitchell C. Hunter
- Soil Science top 2%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 10
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 8
- Bioenergy crop production and management 6
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility 4
- Forestry top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 5
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
-
- Climate change impacts on agriculture 6
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5
-
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 4
- Co-authors
- David A. MortensenMeagan E. SchipanskiRichard G. SmithLesley W. AtwoodBárbara BaraibarJason P. KayeCharles M. WhiteDenise M. Finney
- Journals
- Agricultural & Environmental Letters (4 papers)Agronomy Journal (3 papers)Crop Science (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSpain
In The Last Decade
Mitchell C. Hunter
27 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Soil Science 552
- Agronomy and Crop Science 587
- Forestry 92
- Plant Science 781
- Environmental Chemistry 161
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell C. Hunter
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell C. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell C. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell C. Hunter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell C. Hunter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell C. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell C. Hunter. The network helps show where Mitchell C. Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell C. Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 89 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 20 | A co-development approach to investigating wintering options on dairy farms in southern New Zealand. | 2014 | 1 |
About Mitchell C. Hunter
Mitchell C. Hunter is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science and Forestry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (10 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (6 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (6 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (4 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (552 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (587 citations) and Forestry (92 citations). Mitchell C. Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include David A. Mortensen, Meagan E. Schipanski, Richard G. Smith, Lesley W. Atwood, Bárbara Baraibar, Jason P. Kaye, Charles M. White, Denise M. Finney, Nicholas R. Jordan and Adam S. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Agronomy Journal, Crop Science, PLoS ONE and Weed Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.