James C. LaChance

499 total citations
9 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

James C. LaChance is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James C. LaChance has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 3 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in James C. LaChance's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (3 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers). James C. LaChance is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (3 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers). James C. LaChance collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. James C. LaChance's co-authors include Jason P. Kaye, Denise M. Finney, Charles M. White, Brosi A. Bradley, S. Tianna DuPont, Mitchell C. Hunter, Meagan E. Schipanski, David A. Mortensen, Ebony G. Murrell and Bárbara Baraibar and has published in prestigious journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Sustainability and Agronomy Journal.

In The Last Decade

James C. LaChance

8 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James C. LaChance United States 6 208 178 172 52 46 9 371
Antoine Couëdel France 9 169 0.8× 220 1.2× 211 1.2× 24 0.5× 72 1.6× 18 410
Charlie White United States 2 238 1.1× 196 1.1× 212 1.2× 57 1.1× 67 1.5× 2 479
Guillermo S. Marcillo United States 6 178 0.9× 144 0.8× 98 0.6× 51 1.0× 43 0.9× 8 290
Ann M. Johanns United States 3 139 0.7× 173 1.0× 213 1.2× 52 1.0× 74 1.6× 8 461
R. Seidel United States 5 155 0.7× 143 0.8× 215 1.3× 46 0.9× 78 1.7× 7 380
Alceu Luiz Assmann Brazil 10 165 0.8× 142 0.8× 93 0.5× 46 0.9× 77 1.7× 15 331
Victoria J. Ackroyd United States 11 280 1.3× 301 1.7× 295 1.7× 79 1.5× 74 1.6× 24 531
Joanne R. Thiessen Martens Canada 13 211 1.0× 210 1.2× 234 1.4× 74 1.4× 51 1.1× 19 463
F. Caporali Italy 11 104 0.5× 136 0.8× 252 1.5× 93 1.8× 74 1.6× 34 456
Greta Gramig United States 9 134 0.6× 124 0.7× 227 1.3× 45 0.9× 75 1.6× 26 432

Countries citing papers authored by James C. LaChance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. LaChance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. LaChance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. LaChance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. LaChance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. LaChance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. LaChance. The network helps show where James C. LaChance may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. LaChance

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. LaChance. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. LaChance based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. LaChance. James C. LaChance is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Murrell, Ebony G., Bárbara Baraibar, Mary E. Barbercheck, et al.. (2025). Managing cover crop mixtures over a decade via species replacement and seeding rate adjustment. Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 10(2).
2.
Baur, Patrick, Aidee Guzman, S. Franz Bender, et al.. (2021). Narrow and Brittle or Broad and Nimble? Comparing Adaptive Capacity in Simplifying and Diversifying Farming Systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 5. 74 indexed citations
3.
LaChance, James C., et al.. (2019). Terroir in Transition: Environmental Change in the Wisconsin Artisanal Cheese and New England Oyster Sectors. Sustainability. 11(10). 2969–2969. 7 indexed citations
4.
LaChance, James C., et al.. (2019). Targeting hallmarks of cancer with a food-system–based approach. Nutrition. 69. 110563–110563. 16 indexed citations
5.
Hunter, Mitchell C., Meagan E. Schipanski, James C. LaChance, et al.. (2019). Cover Crop Mixture Effects on Maize, Soybean, and Wheat Yield in Rotation. Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 4(1). 48 indexed citations
6.
LaChance, James C.. (2019). “We can't just be a county that supports inebriants”: Voices of the noncannabis agricultural community. California Agriculture. 73(3). 169–176. 5 indexed citations
7.
Murrell, Ebony G., Meagan E. Schipanski, Denise M. Finney, et al.. (2016). Achieving Diverse Cover Crop Mixtures: Effects of Planting Date and Seeding Rate. Agronomy Journal. 109(1). 259–271. 83 indexed citations
8.
White, Charles M., S. Tianna DuPont, Denise M. Finney, et al.. (2016). Managing the trade off between nitrogen supply and retention with cover crop mixtures. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 237. 121–133. 136 indexed citations
9.
LaChance, James C., Mitchell C. Hunter, & Denise M. Finney. (2015). Post-Its and Priorities: A Participatory Exercise for Understanding Perspectives of Diverse Stakeholders. Journal of Extension. 53(5). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026