Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification
Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Smith. The network helps show where Richard G. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Smith. Richard G. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Whalen, Emily D., A. Stuart Grandy, Noah W. Sokol, et al.. (2022). Clarifying the evidence for microbial‐ and plant‐derived soil organic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding. Global Change Biology. 28(24). 7167–7185.238 indexed citations breakdown →
Smith, Richard G., et al.. (2016). Recognizing and Reducing the Risk of Opioid Misuse in Orthopaedic Practice.. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 25(4). 238–243.18 indexed citations
12.
Berry, P. A. M., et al.. (2013). 20 Years of River and Lake Monitoring from Multi-Mission Satellite Radar Altimetry. 710. 12.1 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Richard G., P. A. M. Berry, & Jérôme Benveniste. (2013). ACE2 Validation and Future Look. 710. 36.1 indexed citations
14.
Berry, P. A. M. & Richard G. Smith. (2010). A global assessment of the EnviSat -RA2 performance over non-ocean surfaces.. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 686. 27.2 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Richard G. & Charlotte W. Lewis. (2005). Availability of dental appointments for young children in King County, Washington: implications for access to care.. PubMed. 27(3). 207–11.25 indexed citations
Middleton, K. R., et al.. (1976). I. “Pakihi” soils. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 4(4). 423–427.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.