Miroslav Dinić
- Aging top 5%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 4
- Food Science top 2%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 10
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Microbiology top 10%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities 3
-
- Gut microbiota and health 13
- Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 5
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 3
-
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 2
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Nataša GolićJelena DjokićJovanka LukićMarina MilenkovićJelena BegovićMagdalena StevanovićNenad FilipovićKatarina Veljović
- Partner nations
- SerbiaRussiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Miroslav Dinić
32 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Aging 40
- Food Science 368
- Biological Psychiatry 38
- Microbiology 61
- Complementary and alternative medicine 59
Countries citing papers authored by Miroslav Dinić
This map shows the geographic impact of Miroslav Dinić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miroslav Dinić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miroslav Dinić more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miroslav Dinić
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miroslav Dinić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miroslav Dinić. The network helps show where Miroslav Dinić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miroslav Dinić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 80 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 79 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 69 | |
| 17 | Exopolysaccharide Produced by Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus paraplantarum BGCG11 Reduces Inflammatory Hyperalgesia in Ratsbreakdown → | 2018 | 311 |
| 18 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 22 |
About Miroslav Dinić
Miroslav Dinić is a scholar working on Aging, Biological Psychiatry and Food Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (13 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (10 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (5 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (3 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (40 citations), Food Science (368 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (38 citations). Miroslav Dinić has collaborated with scholars based in Serbia, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nataša Golić, Jelena Djokić, Jovanka Lukić, Marina Milenković, Jelena Begović, Magdalena Stevanović, Nenad Filipović, Katarina Veljović, Uroš Pecikoza and Radica Stepanović‐Petrović. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and The FASEB Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.