Min Chang

685 total citations
48 papers, 384 citations indexed

About

Min Chang is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Min Chang has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 384 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Min Chang's work include Memory Processes and Influences (20 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers). Min Chang is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (20 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers). Min Chang collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Min Chang's co-authors include Charles J. Brainerd, Jingxin Wang, Kevin B. Paterson, Brian Odegaard, Hakwan Lau, Sing‐Hang Cheung, Sainan Zhao, Victoria A. McGowan, Kuan‐Chia Lin and Michael P. Toglia and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Min Chang

43 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Min Chang

DEP

ECP

Lisa Smithson Canada

Jei-Tun Wu Taiwan

Norman W. Bray United States

Saskia Kohnen Australia

Szymon Wichary Poland

Attila Krajcsi Hungary

Natalie Klein United States

Martin R. Vasilev United Kingdom

Isabella Lonciari Italy

Elizabeth W. Goodell United States

Lisa Smithson Canada

Min Chang

90 ×0.4

136 ×1.0

DEP

120 ×1.3

ECP

36 ×0.5

13 ×0.2

Citations per year, relative to Min Chang Min Chang (= 1×) peers Lisa Smithson

Countries citing papers authored by Min Chang

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min Chang

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min Chang. The network helps show where Min Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Min Chang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Min Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Min Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Min Chang. Min Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chang, Min, et al.. (2025). How gist and association affect false memory: False recognition and gist rating norms. Behavior Research Methods. 57(6). 159–159.

Chang, Min, Brendan T. Johns, & Charles J. Brainerd. (2025). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Integrating fuzzy-trace theory and computational memory modeling.. Psychological Review. 132(4). 857–894. 1 indexed citations

Chang, Min & Charles J. Brainerd. (2024). Effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity on true and false memory. Memory & Cognition. 52(7). 1494–1509. 1 indexed citations

Sun, Junjie, et al.. (2024). The role of CELF family in neurodevelopment and neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurobiology of Disease. 197. 106525–106525. 7 indexed citations

Brainerd, Charles J., et al.. (2023). From association to gist: Some critical tests.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 50(6). 930–943. 1 indexed citations

Brainerd, Charles J., et al.. (2023). The big three: Accuracy, organization, and retrieval effects of latent semantic attributes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 152(6). 1768–1786. 1 indexed citations

Chang, Min & Charles J. Brainerd. (2023). The font size effect depends on inter-item relation. Memory & Cognition. 51(7). 1702–1713. 2 indexed citations

Chang, Min & Charles J. Brainerd. (2022). Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect. Metacognition and Learning. 17(2). 443–476. 15 indexed citations

Brainerd, Charles J., et al.. (2021). A fundamental asymmetry in human memory: Old ≠ not-new and new ≠ not-old.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 48(12). 1850–1867. 5 indexed citations

10.

Chang, Min & Charles J. Brainerd. (2021). Factor analyses of the ADNI neuropsychological battery: An examination of diagnostic and longitudinal invariance.. Neuropsychology. 35(4). 434–450. 1 indexed citations

11.

Zhao, Sainan, Li Lin, Min Chang, Jingxin Wang, & Kevin B. Paterson. (2020). A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 74(1). 68–76. 11 indexed citations

12.

Chang, Min, et al.. (2020). The Relationship between Self-efficacy and Posttraumatic Growth : Mediating Effect of Cognitive Flexibility and Hope. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 20(6). 131–141. 1 indexed citations

13.

Xie, Fang, Victoria A. McGowan, Min Chang, et al.. (2020). Revealing similarities in the perceptual span of young and older Chinese readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73(8). 1189–1205. 4 indexed citations

14.

Brainerd, Charles J., et al.. (2020). Norming retrieval processes. Journal of Memory and Language. 115. 104143–104143. 3 indexed citations

15.

Chang, Min, Charles J. Brainerd, Michael P. Toglia, & Stephen R. Schmidt. (2020). Norms for emotion-false memory lists. Behavior Research Methods. 53(1). 96–112. 12 indexed citations

16.

Brainerd, Charles J., et al.. (2019). Verbatim editing: A general model of recollection rejection.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(10). 1776–1790. 5 indexed citations

17.

Li, Lin, Sha Li, Fang Xie, et al.. (2019). Establishing a role for the visual complexity of linguistic stimuli in age-related reading difficulty: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 81(8). 2626–2634. 11 indexed citations

18.

Zhao, Sainan, Lin Li, Min Chang, et al.. (2019). Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.. Psychology and Aging. 34(6). 780–790. 19 indexed citations

19.

Odegaard, Brian, Min Chang, Hakwan Lau, & Sing‐Hang Cheung. (2018). Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 373(1755). 20170345–20170345. 39 indexed citations

20.

Lin, Kuan‐Chia, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of the effects of a birth plan on Taiwanese women's childbirth experiences, control and expectations fulfilment: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 47(7). 806–814. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact