Brian Odegaard

1.5k total citations
30 papers, 684 citations indexed

About

Brian Odegaard is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian Odegaard has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 684 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Brian Odegaard's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Brian Odegaard is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Brian Odegaard collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Brian Odegaard's co-authors include Hakwan Lau, Ladan Shams, David R. Wozny, Robert T. Knight, Megan A. K. Peters, Michele A. Basso, Piercesare Grimaldi, Brian Maniscalco, Sing‐Hang Cheung and Min Chang and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Brian Odegaard

28 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brian Odegaard United States 13 570 273 131 101 26 30 684
Warrick Roseboom United Kingdom 18 664 1.2× 350 1.3× 159 1.2× 179 1.8× 9 0.3× 39 850
David R. Wozny United States 11 637 1.1× 609 2.2× 291 2.2× 134 1.3× 9 0.3× 17 853
Fiona Macpherson United Kingdom 15 521 0.9× 370 1.4× 64 0.5× 135 1.3× 9 0.3× 30 763
Marcus R. Watson Canada 12 234 0.4× 160 0.6× 74 0.6× 81 0.8× 15 0.6× 22 427
Nadine Dijkstra United Kingdom 11 729 1.3× 163 0.6× 51 0.4× 108 1.1× 6 0.2× 21 862
Olympia Colizoli Netherlands 8 295 0.5× 201 0.7× 164 1.3× 78 0.8× 11 0.4× 16 435
Maria J. S. Guerreiro Germany 13 445 0.8× 271 1.0× 102 0.8× 54 0.5× 4 0.2× 24 518
Daniel Linares Spain 12 430 0.8× 161 0.6× 46 0.4× 91 0.9× 5 0.2× 25 526
Shahab Ghorashi Canada 11 600 1.1× 120 0.4× 62 0.5× 42 0.4× 11 0.4× 15 650
Souta Hidaka Japan 14 336 0.6× 297 1.1× 94 0.7× 85 0.8× 2 0.1× 52 447

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Odegaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Odegaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Odegaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Odegaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Odegaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Odegaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Odegaard. The network helps show where Brian Odegaard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Odegaard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Odegaard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Odegaard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Odegaard. Brian Odegaard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gao, Yi, et al.. (2025). Automatic multisensory integration follows subjective confidence rather than objective performance. Communications Psychology. 3(1). 38–38.
2.
Du, Jing, et al.. (2025). Metacognitive sensitivity: The key to calibrating trust and optimal decision making with AI. PNAS Nexus. 4(5). pgaf133–pgaf133. 3 indexed citations
3.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2024). Heterarchy or hierarchy? Insights from a new model of visual imagination. Physics of Life Reviews. 49. 74–76. 1 indexed citations
4.
Shen, Angela K., et al.. (2024). Aligning consciousness science and U.S. funding agency priorities. Communications Biology. 7(1). 1315–1315. 1 indexed citations
5.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2024). Consistent metacognitive efficiency and variable response biases in peripheral vision. Journal of Vision. 24(8). 4–4. 1 indexed citations
6.
Baldwin, Matthew, et al.. (2023). Metacognition and Causal Inference in Audiovisual Speech. Multisensory Research. 36(3). 289–311. 5 indexed citations
7.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in the sound-induced flash illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 378(1886). 20220347–20220347. 2 indexed citations
8.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2022). Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against “cost-free” representations. PLoS ONE. 17(12). e0279686–e0279686. 6 indexed citations
9.
Maniscalco, Brian, Brian Odegaard, Piercesare Grimaldi, et al.. (2021). Tuned inhibition in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior. PLoS Computational Biology. 17(3). e1008779–e1008779. 28 indexed citations
10.
Fahrenfort, Johannes J., et al.. (2020). An investigation of how relative precision of target encoding influences metacognitive performance. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 83(1). 512–524. 12 indexed citations
11.
Odegaard, Brian, Min Chang, Hakwan Lau, & Sing‐Hang Cheung. (2018). Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 373(1755). 20170345–20170345. 39 indexed citations
12.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2018). Superior colliculus neuronal ensemble activity signals optimal rather than subjective confidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(7). E1588–E1597. 53 indexed citations
13.
Odegaard, Brian, Ulrik Beierholm, Jason M. Carpenter, & Ladan Shams. (2018). Prior expectation of objects in space is dependent on the direction of gaze. Cognition. 182. 220–226. 6 indexed citations
14.
Odegaard, Brian, et al.. (2018). Subjective inflation: phenomenology’s get-rich-quick scheme. Current Opinion in Psychology. 29. 49–55. 33 indexed citations
15.
Li, Musen Kingsley, Hakwan Lau, & Brian Odegaard. (2018). An investigation of detection biases in the unattended periphery during simulated driving. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 80(6). 1325–1332. 20 indexed citations
16.
Odegaard, Brian, Robert T. Knight, & Hakwan Lau. (2017). Should a Few Null Findings Falsify Prefrontal Theories of Conscious Perception?. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(40). 9593–9602. 166 indexed citations
17.
Odegaard, Brian & Hakwan Lau. (2016). Methodological Considerations to Strengthen Studies of Peripheral Vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9). 642–643. 5 indexed citations
18.
Lau, Hakwan, et al.. (2016). What Type of Awareness Does Binocular Rivalry Assess?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(10). 719–720. 18 indexed citations
19.
Odegaard, Brian, David R. Wozny, & Ladan Shams. (2015). Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space. PLoS Computational Biology. 11(12). e1004649–e1004649. 93 indexed citations
20.
Odegaard, Brian, David R. Wozny, & Ladan Shams. (2012). The effects of selective and divided attention on sensory integration. Journal of Vision. 12(9). 658–658. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Warrick Roseboom Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David R. Wozny Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona Macpherson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marcus R. Watson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadine Dijkstra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olympia Colizoli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria J. S. Guerreiro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Linares Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shahab Ghorashi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Souta Hidaka
Rankless by CCL
2026