Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Smith. The network helps show where Mike Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Smith. Mike Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Mike. (2005). ENPOWER: management of nuclear plant operation by optimising weld repairs, final technical report, Contract FIKS-CT-2001-00167. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
Natalucci, L., A. Bazzano, D. Cardini, et al.. (1999). Two Black Hole X-Ray Novae Observed with BeppoSAX WFC in the Galactic Bulge. 38. 317.
10.
Ubertini, P., A. Bazzano, M. Cocchi, et al.. (1999). Long Term Behaviour of the Hard Tailed X-Ray Burster GS1826-238. 38. 129.1 indexed citations
11.
Heise, J., J. J. M. in’t Zand, Mike Smith, et al.. (1999). DIM Transient X-Ray Binaries in the Galactic Bulge. 38. 297.
12.
Ubertini, P., A. Bazzano, M. Cocchi, et al.. (1999). Galactic Centre Population: a View from the WFC on BeppoSAX. 38. 301.5 indexed citations
13.
May, A D, et al.. (1996). A Comparison of the Performance of Alternative Road Pricing Systems. Volume 3: Transport Policy.1 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Mike, et al.. (1994). A COMPARISON OF THE NETWORK EFFECTS OF FOUR ROAD-USER CHARGING SYSTEMS. Traffic engineering & control. 35(5). 311–315.12 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Mike, et al.. (1994). COMPARISONS OF THE PERFORMANCES OF THREE RESPONSIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL POLICIES, TAKING DRIVERS' DAY-TO-DAY ROUTE CHOICES INTO ACCOUNT.. Traffic engineering & control. 35(10). 555–560.9 indexed citations
16.
Maher, Mike, et al.. (1993). Accident - and travel time-minimising routeing patterns in congested networks. Traffic engineering & control. 34(9). 414–419.16 indexed citations
Smith, Mike, et al.. (1992). ROAD PRICING: A NEW MODEL FOR ASSESSING THE MANY OPTIONS. Traffic engineering & control. 33(3). 156–157.3 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Mike, et al.. (1991). NEW DYNAMIC MODEL TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF URBAN TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE STRATEGIES. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.15 indexed citations
20.
French, R. G., Pierre‐Yves Longaretti, & Mike Smith. (1988). Width-Radius Relations for Uranus' Narrow Rings. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 845.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.