Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review

230 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 230 indexed citations. Written by Mike Smith, Simon Hayward, Sue Innes and Ashley Miller covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (187 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (126 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (98 citations). Published in Anaesthesia.

Countries where authors are citing Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Point‐of‐care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID ‐19 – a narrative review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/anae.15082.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026