This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Campbell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Campbell. The network helps show where Liz Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Campbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Campbell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Campbell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Campbell. Liz Campbell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Campbell, Liz. (2021). Revisiting and re-situating deferred prosecution agreements in Australia: lessons from England and Wales. Sydney law review. 43(2). 187–223.1 indexed citations
3.
Campbell, Liz, et al.. (2019). Privacy, Crime Control and Police Use of Automated Facial Recognition Technology. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 2019(3). 188–204.18 indexed citations
Campbell, Liz. (2016). Organised crime and corruption in the UK : responding through law.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).
6.
Campbell, Liz. (2015). The offence of participating in activities of organised crime group : section 45 of the Serious Crime Act 2015.. Durham Research Online (Durham University).1 indexed citations
7.
Lynch, Nessa & Liz Campbell. (2012). Competing Paradigms? The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Campbell, Liz. (2011). "Non-conviction" DNA databases and criminal justice : a comparative analysis.. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 1. 55–77.1 indexed citations
9.
Campbell, Liz. (2010). A Rights-based Analysis of DNA Retention. 889–905.2 indexed citations
10.
Campbell, Liz. (2010). A Rights-Based Analysis of DNA Retention: 'Non-Conviction' Databases and the Liberal State. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 2010(12). 889–905.7 indexed citations
11.
Campbell, Liz. (2010). DNA Databases and Innocent Persons: Lessons From Scotland?. 4(4). 285–296.2 indexed citations
12.
Campbell, Liz. (2010). The Scottish DNA Database and the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Campbell, Liz. (2008). The Culture of Control in Ireland: Theorising Recent Developments in Criminal Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2008(1).1 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, Liz. (2007). The Criminal Justice Act 2007 - A Theoretical Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. 17(2). 8–15.2 indexed citations
Campbell, Liz. (2006). Taxing Illegal Assets: The Revenue Work of the Criminal Assets Bureau. SSRN Electronic Journal. 24. 316–321.1 indexed citations
18.
Campbell, Liz. (2006). Decline of Due Process in the Irish Justice System: Beyond the Culture of Control?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6(1).
19.
Campbell, Liz. (2006). From Due Process to Crime Control: The Decline of Liberalism in the Irish Criminal Justice System. SSRN Electronic Journal. 25(15). 281–288.
20.
Campbell, Liz. (2006). The Case for Living Wills in Ireland. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12. 5–21.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.