459 total citations 37 papers, 243 citations indexed
About
Dale A. Nance is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations.
According to data from OpenAlex, Dale A. Nance has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Law, 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Dale A. Nance's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (16 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (12 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers). Dale A. Nance is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (16 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (12 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers). Dale A. Nance collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dale A. Nance's co-authors include Scott B. Morris and Maxwell J. Mehlman and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Reports, The Journal of Legal Studies and Michigan Law Review.
Citations per year, relative to Dale A. Nance Dale A. Nance (= 1×)
peers
Mike Redmayne
Countries citing papers authored by Dale A. Nance
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dale A. Nance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dale A. Nance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dale A. Nance more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dale A. Nance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dale A. Nance. The network helps show where Dale A. Nance may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dale A. Nance
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dale A. Nance.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dale A. Nance based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dale A. Nance. Dale A. Nance is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nance, Dale A.. (2018). Formalism and Potential Surprise: Theorizing About Standards of Proof. Seton Hall Law Review. 48(4). 3.
2.
Nance, Dale A.. (2016). The Burdens of Proof. Cambridge University Press eBooks.34 indexed citations
Nance, Dale A.. (2006). Rules, Standards, and the Internal Point of View. Fordham law review. 75(3). 1287.3 indexed citations
7.
Nance, Dale A.. (2005). Two Concepts of Reliability. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 5(1). 1–12.1 indexed citations
8.
Nance, Dale A. & Scott B. Morris. (2005). Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small and Quantifiable Random Match Probability. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
9.
Nance, Dale A.. (2003). Reliability and the Admissibility of Experts. Seton Hall Law Review. 34(1). 8.11 indexed citations
Nance, Dale A.. (1988). The Best Evidence Principle. eYLS (Yale Law School).19 indexed citations
19.
Nance, Dale A.. (1986). A Comment on the Supposed Paradoxes of a Mathematical Interpretation of the Logic of Trials. eYLS (Yale Law School).3 indexed citations
20.
Nance, Dale A.. (1985). Legal Theory and the Pivotal Role of the Concept of Coercion. Faculty publications.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.