Law Probability and Risk

347 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 347 papers published in Law Probability and Risk in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Law Probability and Risk usually cover Law (96 papers), Economics and Econometrics (83 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (74 papers) specifically the topics of Jury Decision Making Processes (67 papers), Economic Analysis of Law and Legal Systems (64 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law Probability and Risk are Simon A. Cole, William C. Thompson, Joseph L. Gastwirth, Olivier Ribaux, Jennifer L. Mnookin, Tim van Gelder, Franco Taroni, Jonathan J. Koehler, Alex Biedermann and James M. Curran.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Law Probability and Risk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law Probability and Risk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law Probability and Risk.

Countries where authors publish in Law Probability and Risk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law Probability and Risk. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law Probability and Risk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law Probability and Risk more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025