Mike Quijano
About
In The Last Decade
Mike Quijano
10 papers receiving 576 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Food Science 337
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 257
- Molecular Biology 217
- Dermatology 155
- Analytical Chemistry 64
Countries citing papers authored by Mike Quijano
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Quijano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Quijano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Quijano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Quijano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Quijano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Quijano. The network helps show where Mike Quijano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Quijano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Quijano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Quijano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Quijano. Mike Quijano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 116 | |
| 6 | 373 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 17 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.