William Seibel
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Click Chemistry and Applications 5
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 5
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 5
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles 5
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 7
- PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer 5
- Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling 5
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 4
- Co-authors
- Biplab DasguptaChris R. EvelynYi ZhengMatthew D. WortmanXun ShangNisha S. SipesE. J. CoreyDinabandhu Naskar
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Seibel
63 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Organic Chemistry 438
- Molecular Biology 943
- Cell Biology 207
- Oncology 176
- Pharmacology 97
Countries citing papers authored by William Seibel
This map shows the geographic impact of William Seibel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Seibel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Seibel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Seibel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Seibel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Seibel. The network helps show where William Seibel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Seibel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 10 | High Throughput and High Content Screening Capabilities of the University of Cincinnati Drug Discovery Center | 2013 | 0 |
| 11 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 176 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 28 | |
| 19 | The determination of epithelial thickness in selected oral sites. | 1977 | 1 |
| 20 | Veränderungen des Vitamin- und Mineralstoffgehaltes von Nahrungspflanzen durch technologische Maßnahmen | 1976 | 0 |
About William Seibel
William Seibel is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (7 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (5 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (5 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles (5 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (438 citations), Molecular Biology (943 citations), Cell Biology (207 citations), Oncology (176 citations) and Pharmacology (97 citations). William Seibel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Biplab Dasgupta, Chris R. Evelyn, Yi Zheng, Matthew D. Wortman, Xun Shang, Nisha S. Sipes, E. J. Corey, Dinabandhu Naskar, Amrita Roy and David E. Portlock. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Molecular Pharmacology, SLAS DISCOVERY, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Cell chemical biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.