Miguel Gutiérrez
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ana González‐PintoJesús EzcurraFernando MosqueraNatalia OjedaPurificación López‐MahíaJosé de LeónEdorta ElizagárateJavier Peña
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (24 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (15 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Miguel Gutiérrez
54 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Psychiatry and Mental health 785
- Clinical Psychology 289
- Cognitive Neuroscience 187
- Pharmacology 146
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Gutiérrez
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Gutiérrez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Gutiérrez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Gutiérrez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Gutiérrez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Gutiérrez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Gutiérrez. The network helps show where Miguel Gutiérrez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Gutiérrez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Gutiérrez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Gutiérrez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Gutiérrez. Miguel Gutiérrez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | La generación del 50: un mundo dividido, 20 años después | 0 |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 115 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | 112 |
About Miguel Gutiérrez
Miguel Gutiérrez is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (24 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (15 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (785 citations), Biological Psychiatry (78 citations) and Clinical Psychology (289 citations). Miguel Gutiérrez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ana González‐Pinto, Jesús Ezcurra, Fernando Mosquera, Natalia Ojeda, Purificación López‐Mahía, José de León, Edorta Elizagárate, Javier Peña, Pedro Sánchez and Rafael Segarra. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.