Eduard Vieta
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.01%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Pharmacology top 0.02%
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.01%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Anabel Martínez‐AránFrancesc ColomJosé Sánchez‐MorenoCarla TorrentMaría ReinaresMichael BerkJosé Manuel GoikoleaIría Grande
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (883 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (438 papers)Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (360 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineThe LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Eduard Vieta
1.2k papers receiving 51.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
- Psychiatry and Mental health 41.2k
- Clinical Psychology 11.5k
- Pharmacology 7.0k
- Biological Psychiatry 6.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Eduard Vieta
This map shows the geographic impact of Eduard Vieta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduard Vieta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduard Vieta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eduard Vieta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduard Vieta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduard Vieta. The network helps show where Eduard Vieta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eduard Vieta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eduard Vieta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eduard Vieta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eduard Vieta. Eduard Vieta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Speech and Hearing, having authored 1.2k papers that have together received 53.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (883 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (438 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (360 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (41.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (6.5k citations) and Speech and Hearing (4.3k citations). Eduard Vieta has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anabel Martínez‐Arán, Francesc Colom, José Sánchez‐Moreno, Carla Torrent, María Reinares, Michael Berk, José Manuel Goikolea, Iría Grande, Adriane Ribeiro Rosa and Caterina del Mar Bonnín. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.