Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Impact of Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Male Partner Violence on Women's Mental Health: Depressive Symptoms, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, State Anxiety, and Suicide
2006612 citationsEnrique Echeburúa et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Enrique Echeburúa
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Enrique Echeburúa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enrique Echeburúa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enrique Echeburúa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enrique Echeburúa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enrique Echeburúa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enrique Echeburúa. The network helps show where Enrique Echeburúa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enrique Echeburúa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enrique Echeburúa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enrique Echeburúa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Enrique Echeburúa. Enrique Echeburúa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (2016). Mala praxis en Psicología Clínica y Forense a la luz de los tribunales de justicia españoles: un análisis exploratorio. Psicología conductual = behavioral psychology: Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud. 24(1). 179–196.3 indexed citations
5.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (2014). La prueba pericial en la jurisdiccion penal en los consumidores de drogas y drogodependientes: una valoracion integral. 14(1). 189–215.3 indexed citations
6.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (2010). Variables predictoras del rechazo, abandono y fracaso terapéutico en hombres violentos contra su pareja tratados psicológicamente en un marco comunitario. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.30 indexed citations
7.
Amor, Pedro J., Enrique Echeburúa, & Ismael Loinaz. (2009). ¿Se puede establecer una clasificación tipológica de los hombres violentos contra su pareja?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.38 indexed citations
8.
Sarasua, Belén, Irene Zubizarreta, Enrique Echeburúa, & Paz de Corral. (2008). Differential psychopathological profile of victims of intimate partner violence according to age. 12(12). 53–62.4 indexed citations
9.
Quemada, José Ignacio, et al.. (2008). FUNCIONES Y FORMACIÓN DEL NEUROPSICÓLOGO CLÍNICO: UNA PROPUESTA. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 29(3). 301–306.2 indexed citations
10.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (2007). Are there more personality disorders in treatment-seeking patients with eating disorders than in other kind of psychiatric patients? A two control groups comparative study using the IPDE. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.13 indexed citations
11.
Echeburúa, Enrique, Paz de Corral Gargallo, & Pedro J. Amor. (2005). El reto de las nuevas adicciones: objetivos terapéuticos y vías de intervención. Psicología conductual = behavioral psychology: Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud. 13(3). 511–528.10 indexed citations
12.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (2005). REFLEXIONES ANTE LA FORMACiÓN DE LOS PSICÓLOGOS. RETOS DE FUTURO. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 31(136). 175–188.1 indexed citations
13.
Echeburúa, Enrique & Paz de Corral Gargallo. (2004). Raíces psicológicas del fanatismo político. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 30(130). 161–176.3 indexed citations
14.
Amor, Pedro J., Enrique Echeburúa, Paz de Corral, Irene Zubizarreta, & Belén Sarasua. (2002). Repercusiones psicopatológicas de la violencia doméstica en la mujer en función de las circunstancias del maltrato. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2(2). 227–246.54 indexed citations
15.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (1998). Perfiles diferenciales del trastorno de estrés postraumático en distintos tipos de víctimas. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 24(96). 527–556.10 indexed citations
16.
Echeburúa, Enrique. (1996). La psicología de la salud en España: un camino errado. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 22(82). 269–288.2 indexed citations
17.
Mas, María de las Mercedes Borda, et al.. (1996). El juego patológico: un análisis bibliométrico a partir del Psychological Abstracts (1974-1994). Clínica y Salud. 7(2). 123–135.3 indexed citations
18.
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (1995). El control de estímulos y la exposición con prevención de respuesta como tratamiento psicológico de la ludopatía de un adolescente. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 21(75). 125–145.1 indexed citations
Echeburúa, Enrique, et al.. (1991). Tratamientos psicologicos de la fobia social: un analisis critico. Psicothema. 3(1). 7–23.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.