Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?
2017276 citationsMasitah Shahrıll, Miftachul Huda et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Miftachul Huda
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Miftachul Huda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miftachul Huda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miftachul Huda more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miftachul Huda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miftachul Huda. The network helps show where Miftachul Huda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miftachul Huda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miftachul Huda.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miftachul Huda based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Miftachul Huda. Miftachul Huda is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hasbi, Muhammad, et al.. (2021). The Dangerous Global Effect of HIV&AIDS on Society in the Perspective of Islamic Thinking and Medical Science. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 11(5). 4056–4065.2 indexed citations
7.
Kashim, Mohd Izhar Ariff Mohd, et al.. (2021). Factors Influencing Youth’sAkhlaq: A Survey in Arfiah Shelter Home. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 326–334.1 indexed citations
Muslihudin, Muhamad, M. Ilayaraja, K. Shankar, et al.. (2019). Decision support system in kindergarten selection using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). 8(1). 3291–3298.9 indexed citations
Huda, Miftachul, Kamarul Azmi Jasmi, Aminudin Hehsan, et al.. (2017). Empowering Children with Adaptive Technology Skills: Careful Engagement in the Digital Information Age. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.48 indexed citations
14.
Huda, Miftachul, et al.. (2017). Strengthening interaction from direct to virtual basis: Insights from ethical and professional empowerment. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 12(17). 6901–6909.21 indexed citations
15.
Huda, Miftachul, et al.. (2017). Dampak Pembangunan SMPN 3 Blitar Terhadap Kinerja Lalu Lintas Sekitarnya. 2(1).3 indexed citations
16.
Huda, Miftachul. (2016). PEMODELAN TRIP ATTRACTION KENDARAAN PRIBADI PADA RUMAH MAKAN ( STUDI KASUS: JL. MULYOSARI SURABAYA ). 1(2).2 indexed citations
17.
Huda, Miftachul, et al.. (2015). The Significance of Educative Environment to the Character Development. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 3(3).1 indexed citations
18.
Huda, Miftachul, et al.. (2013). Pengaruh Multiple Intelligences Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Listrik Dinamis Kelas X Di SMAN 1 Porong. IPF Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 2(3).7 indexed citations
Huda, Miftachul, et al.. (2012). ILMU KESEJAHTERAAN SOSIAL.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.