Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Capability maturity model, version 1.1
1993787 citationsMark C. Paulk, Bruce Curtis et al.IEEE Softwareprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce Curtis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce Curtis. The network helps show where Bruce Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce Curtis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce Curtis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce Curtis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce Curtis. Bruce Curtis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Curtis, Bruce, et al.. (2013). Socio-economic factors and suicide: The importance of inequality. New Zealand sociology. 28(2). 77–92.7 indexed citations
3.
Curtis, Bruce, et al.. (2013). A socio-poetic: Poems and some thoughts. New Zealand sociology. 28(1). 117.2 indexed citations
4.
Curtis, Bruce. (2007). Academic Life: Commodification, Continuity, Collegiality, Confusion and the Performance Based Research Fund. 32(2). 2.16 indexed citations
Curtis, Bruce, et al.. (2004). THE DESEGREGATION OF GAMBLING MEDIA AND THE EMERGENCE OF A SINGLE FORM OF GAMBLING. 7(21). 41–5.4 indexed citations
7.
Curtis, Bruce. (2002). Public Education and the Manufacture of Solidarity: Christopher Dunkin's Design for Lower Canada. Histoire sociale. 35(70).1 indexed citations
Curtis, Bruce. (1995). Expert Knowledge and the Social Imaginary: The Case of theMontreal Check Census. Histoire sociale. 28(56).5 indexed citations
10.
Paulk, Mark C., et al.. (1993). Capability Maturity Model . . ..43 indexed citations
11.
Paulk, Mark C., Bruce Curtis, Mary Beth Chrissis, & Charles V. Weber. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software. 10(4). 18–27.787 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Curtis, Bruce. (1992). The Export Meat Industry. Labour Employment and Work in New Zealand.2 indexed citations
Curtis, Bruce. (1983). Schoolbooks and the Myth of Curricular Republicanism: The State and the Curriculum in Canada West, 1820-1850. Histoire sociale. 16(32).7 indexed citations
18.
Bannister, Robert C. & Bruce Curtis. (1982). William Graham Sumner. Journal of American History. 69(2). 463–463.1 indexed citations
19.
Sheppard, Sylvia B., Phil Milliman, & Bruce Curtis. (1979). Factors Affecting Programmer Performance in a Debugging Task.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).3 indexed citations
20.
Curtis, Bruce & Sylvia B. Sheppard. (1979). Identification and Validation of Quantitative Measures of the Psychological Complexity of Software.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.