Mie Kito

1.2k citations
18 papers · 404 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mie Kito

17 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Mie Kito
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Social Psychology 259
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Clinical Psychology 80
  • Health 30
Replace Maya Aloni with:
Maya Aloni United States
Reine C. van der Wal Netherlands
Ruibo Xie China
Jean Carlos Natividade Brazil
Éric Bonetto France
Jean‐Louis Tavani France
Christopher H. K. Cheng Hong Kong
Chelsea A. Reid United States
Alana Conner United States
Xinyuan Fu China
Mie Kito relative to Maya Aloni United States Maya Aloni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Maya Aloni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mie Kito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mie Kito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mie Kito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mie Kito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mie Kito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mie Kito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mie Kito. The network helps show where Mie Kito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mie Kito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mie Kito Line = papers co-authored together Mie Kito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200567
2 201763
3 200948
4 201042
5
Soybean quality changes during model storage studies.
198042
6 201035
7 201029
8 201720
9 201716
10 201514
11 201210
12 20147
13 20144
14 20163
15 20212
16 20091
17 20171
18 20220

About Mie Kito

Mie Kito is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (259 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), Clinical Psychology (80 citations) and Health (30 citations). Mie Kito has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marian M. Morry, Masaki Yuki, Robert Thomson, Tara C. Reich, Junko Yamada, Yukio Ando, Julia C. Becker, Dilek Zamantılı Nayır, Lauren M. Hill and Ashley Hall. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Personal Relationships, Evolutionary Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact