Emma Černis

1.6k total citations
40 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Emma Černis is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Černis has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 22 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 12 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Emma Černis's work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (27 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (23 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers). Emma Černis is often cited by papers focused on Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (27 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (23 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers). Emma Černis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Emma Černis's co-authors include Daniel Freeman, Graham Dunn, Katherine Pugh, Helen Startup, Jacinta Cordwell, Gail Wingham, David Kingdon, Nicole Evans, Anke Ehlers and Felicity Waite and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Emma Černis

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Černis United Kingdom 17 724 453 361 296 141 40 1.0k
Ji‐Won Hur South Korea 20 353 0.5× 252 0.6× 420 1.2× 147 0.5× 147 1.0× 63 1.0k
Thomas Ward United Kingdom 18 582 0.8× 334 0.7× 296 0.8× 297 1.0× 180 1.3× 54 1.1k
Nynke Boonstra Netherlands 15 565 0.8× 136 0.3× 396 1.1× 255 0.9× 197 1.4× 73 940
Frank Röhricht United Kingdom 22 564 0.8× 210 0.5× 402 1.1× 365 1.2× 271 1.9× 51 1.1k
Charlotte E. Wittekind Germany 18 319 0.4× 381 0.8× 552 1.5× 194 0.7× 91 0.6× 58 1.0k
Roos Pot-Kolder Netherlands 14 285 0.4× 184 0.4× 164 0.5× 83 0.3× 103 0.7× 22 701
Jason Holden United States 16 559 0.8× 409 0.9× 228 0.6× 152 0.5× 191 1.4× 46 990
Natasha Vorontsova United Kingdom 7 320 0.4× 233 0.5× 195 0.5× 80 0.3× 54 0.4× 11 523
Joy McCarron Canada 5 883 1.2× 330 0.7× 287 0.8× 390 1.3× 125 0.9× 10 1.2k
Pamela Jacobsen United Kingdom 12 235 0.3× 157 0.3× 240 0.7× 100 0.3× 157 1.1× 51 635

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Černis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Černis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Černis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Černis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Černis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Černis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Černis. The network helps show where Emma Černis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Černis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Černis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Černis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Černis. Emma Černis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Černis, Emma, et al.. (2025). Interpersonal computational modelling of social synchrony in schizophrenia and beyond. PubMed. 5. kkaf011–kkaf011.
2.
Černis, Emma, et al.. (2025). The Černis Felt Sense of Anomaly (ČEFSA) Scale. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 54–68.
3.
Černis, Emma, Bao Sheng Loe, Polly Waite, et al.. (2023). Measuring dissociation across adolescence and adulthood: developing the short-form Černis Felt Sense of Anomaly scale (ČEFSA-14). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 52(2). 163–177. 3 indexed citations
4.
Černis, Emma, et al.. (2023). The relationship between dissociation and panic symptoms in adolescence and the exploration of potential mediators. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). e12202–e12202. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fung, Hong Wang, Emma Černis, & Michelle Shum. (2023). Self-stigma predicts post-traumatic and depressive symptoms in traumatized individuals seeking interventions for dissociative symptoms: a preliminary investigation. European journal of psychotraumatology. 14(2). 2251778–2251778. 5 indexed citations
7.
Černis, Emma, Anke Ehlers, & Daniel Freeman. (2022). Psychological mechanisms connected to dissociation: Generating hypotheses using network analyses. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 148. 165–173. 16 indexed citations
8.
Rosebrock, Laina, Emma Černis, Sinéad Lambe, et al.. (2021). Catastrophic cognitions about coronavirus: the Oxford psychological investigation of coronavirus questionnaire [TOPIC-Q]. Psychological Medicine. 52(15). 3550–3559. 8 indexed citations
9.
Černis, Emma, et al.. (2021). A new perspective and assessment measure for common dissociative experiences: ‘Felt Sense of Anomaly’. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0247037–e0247037. 20 indexed citations
10.
Sheaves, Bryony, et al.. (2020). The challenges and opportunities of social connection when hearing derogatory and threatening voices: A thematic analysis with patients experiencing psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 94(2). 341–356. 13 indexed citations
11.
Waite, Felicity, Thomas Kabir, Louise Johns, et al.. (2020). Treating sleep problems in young people at ultra-high-risk of psychosis: study protocol for a single-blind parallel group randomised controlled feasibility trial (SleepWell). BMJ Open. 10(11). e045235–e045235. 8 indexed citations
12.
Černis, Emma, Daniel Freeman, & Anke Ehlers. (2020). Describing the indescribable: A qualitative study of dissociative experiences in psychosis. PLoS ONE. 15(2). e0229091–e0229091. 22 indexed citations
13.
Černis, Emma, Jessica C. Bird, Andrew Molodynski, Anke Ehlers, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 49(4). 472–484. 9 indexed citations
14.
Černis, Emma, Robin J. Evans, Anke Ehlers, & Daniel Freeman. (2020). Dissociation in relation to other mental health conditions: An exploration using network analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 136. 460–467. 46 indexed citations
15.
Waite, Felicity, Nicola Collett, Eleanor Chadwick, et al.. (2019). The comments of voices on the appearance of patients with psychosis: ‘the voices tell me that I am ugly’. BJPsych Open. 5(5). e86–e86. 8 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Daniel, Graham Dunn, Helen Startup, et al.. (2015). An explanatory randomised controlled trial testing the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in psychosis: the Worry Intervention Trial (WIT). ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
17.
Černis, Emma, Graham Dunn, Helen Startup, et al.. (2015). The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire in Patients with Persecutory Delusions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 44(4). 472–481. 20 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, Daniel, Helen Startup, Graham Dunn, et al.. (2014). Understanding jumping to conclusions in patients with persecutory delusions: working memory and intolerance of uncertainty. Psychological Medicine. 44(14). 3017–3024. 46 indexed citations
19.
20.
Freeman, Daniel, Helen Startup, Graham Dunn, et al.. (2013). Persecutory delusions and psychological well-being. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 49(7). 1045–1050. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026