Jane Shears

430 citations
9 papers · 265 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Shears

8 papers receiving 247 citations

Jane Shears's Hit Papers

Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses 2020 · 196 citations
1960+2+4Years since publication50100150

Peers

Jane Shears
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Public Administration 145
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • General Health Professions 155
  • General Social Sciences 11
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Tian Cai with:
Tian Cai China
Ana M. Sobočan Slovenia
Alessandro Sicora Italy
María Jesús Úriz Pemán Spain
Chaitali Das United Kingdom
Katharine Briar‐Lawson United States
Linda Kreitzer Canada
Gordon Jack United Kingdom
Charles D. Cowger United States
Jane McPherson United States
Jane Shears relative to Tian Cai China Tian Cai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tian Cai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Shears

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Shears's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Shears with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Shears more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Shears

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Shears. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Shears. The network helps show where Jane Shears may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jane Shears, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Shears Line = papers co-authored together Jane Shears links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses
Hit paper breakdown →
2020196
2
Ethical challenges for social workers during Covid-19: A global perspective
202042
3 202110
4 20227
5
Practising During Pandemic Conditions : Ethical Guidance for Social Workers
20205
6
Empowering Mental Health Research: User Led Research into the Care Programme Approach
20043
7 20241
8 20201
9 20250

About Jane Shears

Jane Shears is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Disaster Response and Management (1 paper), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (1 paper), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (145 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations), General Health Professions (155 citations), General Social Sciences (11 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). Jane Shears has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include María Jesús Úriz Pemán, Ed de Jonge, Ana M. Sobočan, Merlinda Weinberg, Tian Cai, Michelle Shum, Rory Truell, Sarah Banks, Mary Baginsky and Andrew Whittaker. Their work appears in journals such as International Social Work, The British Journal of Social Work, Health Risk & Society, Ethics and Social Welfare and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact