Michelle Peate

3.9k total citations
83 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Michelle Peate is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Peate has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 39 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 26 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Michelle Peate's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (29 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (26 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers). Michelle Peate is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (29 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (26 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (21 papers). Michelle Peate collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Michelle Peate's co-authors include Martha Hickey, Michael Friedländer, Bettina Meiser, Shanna Logan, Janette Perz, Jane M. Ussher, Christobel Saunders, Antoinette Anazodo, Ursula M. Sansom‐Daly and Claire E. Wakefield and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Hepatology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Peate

80 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michelle Peate Australia	25	1.2k	1.0k	638	436	320	83	2.4k
Mary K. Buss United States	22	1.1k 0.9×	486 0.5×	467 0.7×	1.0k 2.4×	130 0.4×	82	2.4k
Suzanne G. Folger United States	30	1.3k 1.1×	852 0.8×	1.0k 1.6×	1.1k 2.6×	224 0.7×	60	3.3k
Vanessa L. Beesley Australia	26	451 0.4×	188 0.2×	389 0.6×	1.4k 3.2×	217 0.7×	80	1.9k
Vivian W. Pinn United States	21	416 0.4×	134 0.1×	54 0.1×	195 0.4×	143 0.4×	64	1.7k
H. Irene Su United States	28	1.4k 1.2×	1.1k 1.1×	666 1.0×	633 1.5×	40 0.1×	111	2.4k
Sarah E. Ferguson Canada	31	213 0.2×	1.3k 1.3×	238 0.4×	768 1.8×	370 1.2×	161	3.0k
Noreen Maconochie United Kingdom	23	537 0.5×	409 0.4×	682 1.1×	64 0.1×	96 0.3×	46	1.6k
Adele L. Franks United States	19	295 0.3×	74 0.1×	385 0.6×	108 0.2×	182 0.6×	28	1.3k
T. Justin Clark United Kingdom	34	429 0.4×	2.1k 2.0×	98 0.2×	147 0.3×	118 0.4×	148	3.7k
Michel Dreyfus France	27	1.3k 1.1×	62 0.1×	1.6k 2.5×	125 0.3×	498 1.6×	261	3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Peate

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Peate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Peate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Peate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Peate

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Peate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Peate. The network helps show where Michelle Peate may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Peate

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Peate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Peate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Peate. Michelle Peate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Marino, Jennifer L., et al.. (2024). Supportive Care Needs of Young Adults With Endometriosis: An Open‐Ended Online Survey and Exploration of Unmet Needs. Health Expectations. 27(5). e70045–e70045. 1 indexed citations

Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Karin Hammarberg, et al.. (2024). Attitudes, knowledge and practice regarding the anti‐müllerian hormone test among general practitioners and reproductive specialists: A cross‐sectional study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 131(8). 1072–1079.

Mitchell, Alice M., Michelle Peate, Jane Chalmers, et al.. (2024). The “most bothersome symptom” construct: A qualitative study of Australians living with endometriosis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(8). 1625–1633. 2 indexed citations

White, Katherine M., et al.. (2023). Elective egg freezers’ disposition decisions: a qualitative study. Fertility and Sterility. 120(1). 145–160. 8 indexed citations

Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Jenny Doust, et al.. (2023). Community awareness and use of anti-Müllerian hormone testing in Australia: a population survey of women. Human Reproduction. 38(8). 1571–1577. 11 indexed citations

Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Cindy Farquhar, et al.. (2023). Patient and professional perspectives about using in vitro fertilisation add-ons in the UK and Australia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 13(7). e069146–e069146. 1 indexed citations

Lensen, Sarah, Sarah Armstrong, Michelle Peate, et al.. (2023). ‘It all depends on why it’s red’: qualitative interviews exploring patient and professional views of a traffic light system for in vitro fertilisation add-ons. Reproduction and Fertility. 4(2). 2 indexed citations

Hickey, Martha, et al.. (2022). Priorities for alleviating menopausal symptoms after cancer. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 30(2). 136–142. 2 indexed citations

Marino, Jennifer L., et al.. (2022). Unmet Needs in Endometriosis: Lessons from COVID-19. Women s Health Reports. 3(1). 937–943. 6 indexed citations

10.

Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Elaine Wainwright, et al.. (2021). VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia. BMJ Open. 11(5). e047307–e047307. 3 indexed citations

11.

Lensen, Sarah, Karin Hammarberg, Alex Polyakov, et al.. (2021). How common is add-on use and how do patients decide whether to use them? A national survey of IVF patients. Human Reproduction. 36(7). 1854–1861. 34 indexed citations

12.

O’Meara, Yvonne, Catherine M. Kelly, Janice M. Walshe, et al.. (2021). The menopause after cancer study (MACS) - A multimodal technology assisted intervention for the management of menopausal symptoms after cancer – Trial protocol of a phase II study. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 24. 100865–100865. 2 indexed citations

13.

Jayasinghe, Yasmin, Martha Hickey, Lesley Stafford, et al.. (2020). Exploring the facilitators and barriers to using an online infertility risk prediction tool (FoRECAsT) for young women with breast cancer: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 10(2). e033669–e033669.

14.

Hickey, Martha, et al.. (2019). What information do healthcare professionals need to inform premenopausal women about risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy?. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 27(1). 20–25. 8 indexed citations

15.

Khorshidi, Hadi Akbarzadeh, et al.. (2019). Imputation techniques on missing values in breast cancer treatment and fertility data. Health Information Science and Systems. 7(1). 19–19. 15 indexed citations

16.

Peate, Michelle, Lynn Gillam, Margaret Zacharin, et al.. (2019). Satisfaction, disappointment and regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 36(9). 1805–1822. 25 indexed citations

17.

Bush, Deborah, et al.. (2019). Investigating the care needs of those with endometriosis: Are we listening to the patients?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 59(6). 877–879. 5 indexed citations

18.

Gillam, Lynn, Maria McCarthy, Margaret Zacharin, et al.. (2018). Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents With Cancer: Pilot of a Decision Aid for Parents of Children and Adolescents With Cancer. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting. 1(2). e10463–e10463. 28 indexed citations

19.

Jayasinghe, Yasmin, et al.. (2016). Fertility Preservation in Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology Patients: The Decision-Making Process of Parents. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 6(2). 213–222. 37 indexed citations

20.

Peate, Michelle, Bettina Meiser, Benjamin C. Cheah, et al.. (2012). Making hard choices easier: a prospective, multicentre study to assess the efficacy of a fertility-related decision aid in young women with early-stage breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 106(6). 1053–1061. 132 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact