Deborah Bush

883 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 574 citations indexed

About

Deborah Bush is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Bush has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 574 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah Bush's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers). Deborah Bush is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers). Deborah Bush collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Deborah Bush's co-authors include Neil Johnson, Hugh S. Taylor, Linda C. Giudice, Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms, Maurício Simões Abrão, J. Keckstein, Luk Rombauts, Ludwig Kiesel, G. David Adamson and Lone Hummelshøj and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Human Reproduction and Journal of Women s Health.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Bush

9 papers receiving 564 citations

Hit Papers

World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classificati... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Bush Australia 6 524 403 130 116 31 9 574
N Fritzer Austria 10 751 1.4× 611 1.5× 82 0.6× 175 1.5× 58 1.9× 14 792
Mary Lou Ballweg United States 9 596 1.1× 478 1.2× 148 1.1× 135 1.2× 26 0.8× 15 638
S.A. Missmer United States 5 1.1k 2.0× 835 2.1× 339 2.6× 202 1.7× 44 1.4× 9 1.2k
Luiza Helena Abbamonte Italy 11 666 1.3× 535 1.3× 59 0.5× 194 1.7× 67 2.2× 16 723
Gioia Villa Italy 14 590 1.1× 483 1.2× 51 0.4× 228 2.0× 65 2.1× 17 678
Olimpia Gabrielli Italy 7 222 0.4× 245 0.6× 69 0.5× 116 1.0× 18 0.6× 9 354
Giovanni Retto Italy 9 330 0.6× 273 0.7× 151 1.2× 126 1.1× 30 1.0× 19 470
Letizia Zannoni Italy 15 557 1.1× 472 1.2× 46 0.4× 204 1.8× 85 2.7× 35 690
Christiane Niehues Germany 5 330 0.6× 256 0.6× 67 0.5× 68 0.6× 17 0.5× 11 400
Zabeena Pandian United Kingdom 14 866 1.7× 154 0.4× 91 0.7× 552 4.8× 14 0.5× 19 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Bush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Bush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Bush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Bush. The network helps show where Deborah Bush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Bush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Bush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Bush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Bush. Deborah Bush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Hawkey, Alexandra, et al.. (2025). Menstrual Health Symptoms and Literacy among Young Women in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 38(3). 328–335. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ng, Cecilia, Mathew Leonardi, Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, et al.. (2024). Social Media, Endometriosis, and Evidence-Based Information: An Analysis of Instagram Content. Healthcare. 12(1). 121–121. 12 indexed citations
3.
Howe, Danielle, et al.. (2024). The Language of Endometriosis Prevalence: How Can Gender Inclusivity and Accuracy Coexist?. Women s Reproductive Health. 1–18. 5 indexed citations
4.
Tewhaiti-Smith, Jordan, Alex Semprini, Deborah Bush, et al.. (2022). An Aotearoa New Zealand survey of the impact and diagnostic delay for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 4425–4425. 40 indexed citations
5.
Armour, Mike, Justin Sinclair, Geoff Noller, et al.. (2020). Illicit Cannabis Usage as a Management Strategy in New Zealand Women with Endometriosis: An Online Survey. Journal of Women s Health. 30(10). 1485–1492. 26 indexed citations
6.
Bush, Deborah, et al.. (2019). Investigating the care needs of those with endometriosis: Are we listening to the patients?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 59(6). 877–879. 5 indexed citations
7.
Bush, Deborah & Susan Evans. (2017). Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bush, Deborah, et al.. (2017). Endometriosis education in schools: A New Zealand model examining the impact of an education program in schools on early recognition of symptoms suggesting endometriosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 57(4). 452–457. 50 indexed citations
9.
Johnson, Neil, Lone Hummelshøj, G. David Adamson, et al.. (2016). World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 32(2). 315–324. 434 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026