Sarah Lensen

3.1k total citations
58 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Sarah Lensen is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Lensen has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 26 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 20 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Lensen's work include Ovarian function and disorders (29 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (22 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (18 papers). Sarah Lensen is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (29 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (22 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (18 papers). Sarah Lensen collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Sarah Lensen's co-authors include Cindy Farquhar, Ahmed Gibreel, Wellington P. Martins, C.O. Nastri, Jack Wilkinson, Michelle Wise, Vanessa Jordan, Nick Raine‐Fenning, Ben W. Mol and Rui Alberto Ferriani and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Lensen

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Sarah Lensen
Pieternel Steures Netherlands
Yadava Jeve United Kingdom
Madhurima Rajkhowa United Kingdom
Edgar Mocanu Ireland
Rik van Eekelen Netherlands
A Tsourapas United Kingdom
Jennifer F. Kawwass United States
Pieternel Steures Netherlands
Sarah Lensen
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Lensen Sarah Lensen (= 1×) peers Pieternel Steures

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Lensen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Lensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Lensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Lensen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Lensen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Lensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Lensen. The network helps show where Sarah Lensen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Lensen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Lensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Lensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Lensen. Sarah Lensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rutherford, Claudia, et al.. (2025). Content validity, face validity and acceptability of three hot flash diaries for vasomotor symptoms: a cognitive interview study. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society.
2.
Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Karin Hammarberg, et al.. (2024). Attitudes, knowledge and practice regarding the anti‐müllerian hormone test among general practitioners and reproductive specialists: A cross‐sectional study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 131(8). 1072–1079.
3.
Mitchell, Alice M., Sarah Lensen, Steven J. Kamper, et al.. (2024). The most impactful endometriosis symptom: An international, cross‐sectional, two‐round survey study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(9). 1736–1744. 5 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, Alice M., Michelle Peate, Jane Chalmers, et al.. (2024). The “most bothersome symptom” construct: A qualitative study of Australians living with endometriosis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(8). 1625–1633. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lensen, Sarah, Matthew R. Sydes, Alex Polyakov, & Jack Wilkinson. (2024). When to randomize patients in a randomized controlled trial?. Fertility and Sterility. 121(6). 902–904. 1 indexed citations
6.
White, Katherine M., et al.. (2023). Elective egg freezers’ disposition decisions: a qualitative study. Fertility and Sterility. 120(1). 145–160. 8 indexed citations
7.
Copp, Tessa, Rachel Thompson, Jenny Doust, et al.. (2023). Community awareness and use of anti-Müllerian hormone testing in Australia: a population survey of women. Human Reproduction. 38(8). 1571–1577. 11 indexed citations
8.
Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Cindy Farquhar, et al.. (2023). Patient and professional perspectives about using in vitro fertilisation add-ons in the UK and Australia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 13(7). e069146–e069146. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hammarberg, Karin, et al.. (2023). What do women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) understand about their chance of IVF success?. Human Reproduction. 39(1). 130–138. 3 indexed citations
10.
Lensen, Sarah, Sarah Armstrong, Michelle Peate, et al.. (2023). ‘It all depends on why it’s red’: qualitative interviews exploring patient and professional views of a traffic light system for in vitro fertilisation add-ons. Reproduction and Fertility. 4(2). 2 indexed citations
11.
Wilkinson, Jack, Marian Showell, Vicky P. Taxiarchi, & Sarah Lensen. (2022). Are we leaving money on the table in infertility RCTs? Trialists should statistically adjust for prespecified, prognostic covariates to increase power. Human Reproduction. 37(5). 895–901. 4 indexed citations
12.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2022). Creativity in lockdown: Understanding how music and the arts supported mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic by age group. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 993259–993259. 6 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Elaine Wainwright, et al.. (2021). VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia. BMJ Open. 11(5). e047307–e047307. 3 indexed citations
14.
Lensen, Sarah, Karin Hammarberg, Alex Polyakov, et al.. (2021). How common is add-on use and how do patients decide whether to use them? A national survey of IVF patients. Human Reproduction. 36(7). 1854–1861. 34 indexed citations
15.
Hammarberg, Karin, et al.. (2021). Endometrial scratching in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom (UK): a follow-up survey. Human Fertility. 26(3). 599–604. 3 indexed citations
16.
Copp, Tessa, Brooke Nickel, Sarah Lensen, et al.. (2021). Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) test information on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites: a content analysis. BMJ Open. 11(7). e046927–e046927. 12 indexed citations
17.
Lensen, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility. 116(6). 1601–1619. 15 indexed citations
18.
Lensen, Sarah, Archie Macnair, Sharon Love, et al.. (2020). Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials – review of successful data requests to UK registries. Trials. 21(1). 398–398. 17 indexed citations
19.
Jordan, Vanessa, Sarah Lensen, & Cindy Farquhar. (2016). There were large discrepancies in risk of bias tool judgments when a randomized controlled trial appeared in more than one systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 81. 72–76. 28 indexed citations
20.
Lensen, Sarah, Lynn Sadler, & Cindy Farquhar. (2016). Endometrial scratching for subfertility: everyone's doing it. Human Reproduction. 31(6). 1241–1244. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026