Sarah Armstrong

1.5k total citations
22 papers, 768 citations indexed

About

Sarah Armstrong is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Armstrong has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 768 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Armstrong's work include Ovarian function and disorders (11 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (8 papers). Sarah Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (11 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (8 papers). Sarah Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Sarah Armstrong's co-authors include Cindy Farquhar, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, Lynsey Cree, Priya Bhide, Jane Marjoribanks, Sarah Lensen, Valentine Akande, Julie Brown and Philip Kaloo and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Armstrong

20 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Armstrong New Zealand 13 500 445 377 132 80 22 768
M. Germond Switzerland 14 436 0.9× 437 1.0× 253 0.7× 79 0.6× 41 0.5× 35 653
Anat Hershko Klement Israel 15 341 0.7× 327 0.7× 242 0.6× 37 0.3× 34 0.4× 57 620
Andrew La Barbera United States 5 303 0.6× 405 0.9× 188 0.5× 36 0.3× 56 0.7× 6 575
W. Urdl Austria 11 333 0.7× 243 0.5× 129 0.3× 41 0.3× 89 1.1× 38 598
Herjan Coelingh Bennink Netherlands 15 667 1.3× 567 1.3× 184 0.5× 55 0.4× 79 1.0× 23 867
Andrew S. Blazar United States 10 449 0.9× 497 1.1× 257 0.7× 51 0.4× 25 0.3× 15 650
Lisa Joels United Kingdom 11 128 0.3× 207 0.5× 112 0.3× 58 0.4× 137 1.7× 21 441
Yu‐Hung Lin Taiwan 15 382 0.8× 422 0.9× 183 0.5× 56 0.4× 25 0.3× 40 622
İnci Kahyaoğlu Türkiye 13 197 0.4× 287 0.6× 104 0.3× 33 0.3× 39 0.5× 71 480
P Vandekerckhove United Kingdom 11 233 0.5× 510 1.1× 110 0.3× 37 0.3× 64 0.8× 22 677

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Armstrong. The network helps show where Sarah Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Armstrong. Sarah Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Cindy Farquhar, et al.. (2023). Patient and professional perspectives about using in vitro fertilisation add-ons in the UK and Australia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 13(7). e069146–e069146. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lensen, Sarah, Sarah Armstrong, Michelle Peate, et al.. (2023). ‘It all depends on why it’s red’: qualitative interviews exploring patient and professional views of a traffic light system for in vitro fertilisation add-ons. Reproduction and Fertility. 4(2). 2 indexed citations
3.
Picard, Émilie, Sarah Armstrong, Melissa K. Andrew, et al.. (2022). Markers of systemic inflammation are positively associated with influenza vaccine antibody responses with a possible role for ILT2(+)CD57(+) NK-cells. Immunity & Ageing. 19(1). 26–26. 9 indexed citations
4.
Armstrong, Sarah, Sarah Lensen, Elaine Wainwright, et al.. (2021). VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia. BMJ Open. 11(5). e047307–e047307. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lensen, Sarah, Sarah Armstrong, Ahmed Gibreel, et al.. (2021). Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(6). CD009517–CD009517. 31 indexed citations
6.
Dash, Isabella, Belinda Pearce, Sarah Armstrong, Christobel Saunders, & Allan Pacey. (2020). Fertility preservation for women undergoing breast cancer treatment: A postcode lottery?. The Breast Journal. 26(10). 2117–2118. 1 indexed citations
7.
Farquhar, Cindy, et al.. (2020). Clinician Identification of Birth Asphyxia Using Intrapartum Cardiotocography Among Neonates With and Without Encephalopathy in New Zealand. JAMA Network Open. 3(2). e1921363–e1921363. 17 indexed citations
8.
Kaloo, Philip, et al.. (2019). Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(1). CD011101–CD011101. 42 indexed citations
9.
Armstrong, Sarah, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, et al.. (2019). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 111 indexed citations
10.
Armstrong, Sarah, et al.. (2019). Add-ons in the laboratory: hopeful, but not always helpful. Fertility and Sterility. 112(6). 994–999. 20 indexed citations
12.
Armstrong, Sarah, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, & Cindy Farquhar. (2018). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 5. CD011320–CD011320. 103 indexed citations
13.
15.
Farquhar, Cindy, et al.. (2015). Under-reporting of maternal and perinatal adverse events in New Zealand. BMJ Open. 5(7). e007970–e007970. 9 indexed citations
16.
Armstrong, Sarah, et al.. (2015). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 5(2). CD011320–CD011320. 209 indexed citations
17.
Armstrong, Sarah, et al.. (2015). Decision aids for the management of menopausal symptoms. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
18.
Armstrong, Sarah, Andy Vail, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek, Vanessa Jordan, & Cindy Farquhar. (2014). Time-lapse in the IVF-lab: how should we assess potential benefit?. Human Reproduction. 30(1). 3–8. 44 indexed citations
19.
Armstrong, Sarah & Valentine Akande. (2013). What is the best treatment option for infertile women aged 40 and over?. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 30(5). 667–671. 25 indexed citations
20.
Pitt, Brice, et al.. (1996). Recruiting patients for drug trials: a difficult task. Psychiatric Bulletin. 20(12). 708–710. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026