African American Review

1.4k papers and 14.4k indexed citations

About

The 1.4k papers published in African American Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in African American Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (454 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (434 papers) and Cultural Studies (197 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (356 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (187 papers) and Music History and Culture (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in African American Review are Peter Erickson, Paul Gilroy, Daryl Michael Scott, William Julius Wilson, Houston A. Baker, Tricia Rose, Patrícia Hill Collins, Candice M. Jenkins, Fred Moten and bell hooks.

In The Last Decade

African American Review

599 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Fields of papers published in African American Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in African American Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in African American Review.

Countries where authors publish in African American Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in African American Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in African American Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African American Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026