John C. Hawley
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Revathi Krishnaswamy
- Topics
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (8 papers)Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers)South Asian Studies and Diaspora (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John C. Hawley
30 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Sociology and Political Science 207
- Literature and Literary Theory 101
- Anthropology 87
- Political Science and International Relations 70
- Social Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Hawley
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Hawley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Hawley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Hawley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Hawley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Hawley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Hawley. The network helps show where John C. Hawley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Hawley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Hawley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Hawley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Hawley. John C. Hawley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | India in Africa, Africa in India: Indian Ocean Cosmopolitanisms | 42 |
| 5 | Introduction: Unrecorded Lives | 2 |
| 6 | The Postcolonial and the Global | 88 |
| 7 | The Emerging Fictionalization of AIDS in Africa | 1 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Post-colonial, Queer: Theoretical Intersections | 110 |
| 12 | The Postcolonial Crescent: Islam's Impact on Contemporary Literature | 5 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Cross-addressing : resistance literature and cultural borders | 13 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Ben Okri's spirit-child: 'abiku' migration and postmodernity | 13 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Robert Antoni's "Divina Trace" and theWomb of Place | 1 |
| 19 | John Henry Newman and the Anxiety of Influence | 0 |
| 20 | 15 |
About John C. Hawley
John C. Hawley is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Philosophy, having authored 42 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (8 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers) and South Asian Studies and Diaspora (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (101 citations), Anthropology (87 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (207 citations). John C. Hawley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Revathi Krishnaswamy. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Modern fiction studies and Research in African Literatures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.