Michal Bošeľa

2.5k citations
89 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michal Bošeľa

82 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michal Bošeľa
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 901
  • Atmospheric Science 583
  • Insect Science 283
  • Ecological Modeling 39
Replace Daniele Castagneri with:
Daniele Castagneri Italy
Ignacio Barbeito Spain
Rongzhou Man Canada
Kamil Bielak Poland
Tzvetan Zlatanov Bulgaria
Emanuele Ziaco United States
Arun K. Bose Switzerland
W. Keith Moser United States
Qing‐Lai Dang Canada
Michele Colangelo Spain
Michal Bošeľa relative to Daniele Castagneri Italy Daniele Castagneri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniele Castagneri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michal Bošeľa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michal Bošeľa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michal Bošeľa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michal Bošeľa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michal Bošeľa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michal Bošeľa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michal Bošeľa. The network helps show where Michal Bošeľa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michal Bošeľa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michal Bošeľa Line = papers co-authored together Michal Bošeľa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201794
2 201683
3 202071
4 201360
5 202051
6 200851
7 201650
8 201645
9 201544
10 201643
11 202043
12 201742
13 201941
14 201939
15 201738
16 201938
17 201437
18 201533
19 202131
20 201631

About Michal Bošeľa

Michal Bošeľa is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (55 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (37 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (32 papers), Forest Management and Policy (24 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (12 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (901 citations), Atmospheric Science (583 citations), Insect Science (283 citations) and Ecological Modeling (39 citations). Michal Bošeľa has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Czechia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vladimír Šebeň, Rudolf Petráš, Róbert Sedmák, Róbert Marušák, Igor Štefančík, Ladislav Kulla, Bohdan Konôpka, Martin Lukáč, Ulf Büntgen and Charles H. Michler. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Dendrochronologia, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, The Science of The Total Environment and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact