Klemens Schadauer

1.7k citations
35 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 20
Topics
Forest ecology and management (25 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (21 papers)Forest Management and Policy (14 papers)

In The Last Decade

Klemens Schadauer

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Klemens Schadauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 706
  • Environmental Engineering 616
  • Global and Planetary Change 580
  • Insect Science 372
  • Ecology 270
Replace Philip J. Radtke with:
Philip J. Radtke United States
Gordon W. Frazer Canada
Paula Soares Portugal
Sören Holm Sweden
Y.A. Hussin Netherlands
Sonia Condés Spain
Kjersti Hanssen Norway
Icíar Alberdi Spain
Joseph E. Means United States
Kalle Eerikäinen Finland
Klemens Schadauer relative to Philip J. Radtke United States Philip J. Radtke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip J. Radtke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klemens Schadauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klemens Schadauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klemens Schadauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klemens Schadauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klemens Schadauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klemens Schadauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klemens Schadauer. The network helps show where Klemens Schadauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klemens Schadauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klemens Schadauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klemens Schadauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klemens Schadauer. Klemens Schadauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 5
3 7
4 38
5 15
6 10
7 26
8 25
9 6
10 60
11 59
12 84
13 97
14 10
15
Specific study on forest greenhouse gas budget
15
16 80
17
Conditions for forest restoration in Austria analysis based on forest inventory data.
4
18
DIE KOHLENSTOFFBILANZ DES ÖSTERREICHISCHEN WALDES UND BETRACHTUNGEN ZUM KYOTO-PROTOKOLL
25
19 82
20
Climate variations and tree growth between 1961 and 1995 in Austria
4

About Klemens Schadauer

Klemens Schadauer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering and Insect Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (21 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (706 citations), Environmental Engineering (616 citations) and Insect Science (372 citations). Klemens Schadauer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Markus Hollaus, Wolfgang Wagner, Thomas Gschwantner, Claude Vidal, Bernhard Maier, Adrian Lanz, Ronald E. McRoberts, Erkki Tomppo, Hubert Hasenauer and Steven W. Running. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Nature Climate Change and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026