Gerhard Schütze

3.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
19 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Gerhard Schütze is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gerhard Schütze has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 14 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Gerhard Schütze's work include Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers). Gerhard Schütze is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers). Gerhard Schütze collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Gerhard Schütze's co-authors include Hans Pretzsch, Enno Uhl, Peter Biber, Thomas Rötzer, Miren del Rı́o, Kamil Bielak, B. L. Lefer, Takayoshi Koike, Ben du Toit and Karl‐Heinz Häberle and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

Gerhard Schütze

19 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in ... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 2014 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gerhard Schütze Germany 18 1.7k 1.6k 881 306 279 19 2.2k
Enno Uhl Germany 21 1.6k 1.0× 1.7k 1.0× 866 1.0× 340 1.1× 339 1.2× 66 2.4k
Jean‐Daniel Bontemps France 26 1.7k 1.0× 1.7k 1.0× 938 1.1× 222 0.7× 224 0.8× 59 2.3k
Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado Spain 24 1.5k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 305 0.3× 294 1.0× 231 0.8× 58 2.1k
Radek Bače Czechia 25 933 0.6× 947 0.6× 504 0.6× 787 2.6× 297 1.1× 50 1.7k
Peter Annighöfer Germany 23 1.2k 0.7× 775 0.5× 226 0.3× 495 1.6× 269 1.0× 74 1.7k
Harri Strandman Finland 26 721 0.4× 1.1k 0.7× 335 0.4× 204 0.7× 202 0.7× 54 1.7k
Andrés Bravo‐Oviedo Spain 28 1.4k 0.8× 1.2k 0.8× 283 0.3× 342 1.1× 137 0.5× 54 1.9k
Philip G. Comeau Canada 33 2.6k 1.6× 2.3k 1.4× 610 0.7× 591 1.9× 433 1.6× 121 3.4k
Martina Mund Germany 23 677 0.4× 1.3k 0.8× 564 0.6× 216 0.7× 268 1.0× 43 1.8k
Charles A. Nock Canada 19 734 0.4× 973 0.6× 358 0.4× 129 0.4× 273 1.0× 39 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard Schütze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard Schütze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard Schütze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard Schütze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard Schütze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard Schütze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard Schütze. The network helps show where Gerhard Schütze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerhard Schütze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerhard Schütze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerhard Schütze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerhard Schütze. Gerhard Schütze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
2.
Pretzsch, Hans, Torben Hilmers, Peter Biber, et al.. (2020). Evidence of elevation-specific growth changes of spruce, fir, and beech in European mixed mountain forests during the last three centuries. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 50(7). 689–703. 39 indexed citations
3.
Pretzsch, Hans, et al.. (2018). Wood density reduced while wood volume growth accelerated in Central European forests since 1870. Forest Ecology and Management. 429. 589–616. 103 indexed citations
4.
Pretzsch, Hans, Gerhard Schütze, & Peter Biber. (2018). Drought can favour the growth of small in relation to tall trees in mature stands of Norway spruce and European beech. Forest Ecosystems. 5(1). 82 indexed citations
5.
Pretzsch, Hans & Gerhard Schütze. (2018). Growth recovery of mature Norway spruce and European beech from chronic O3 stress. European Journal of Forest Research. 137(2). 251–263. 7 indexed citations
6.
Pretzsch, Hans, Peter Biber, Enno Uhl, et al.. (2017). Climate change accelerates growth of urban trees in metropolises worldwide. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 15403–15403. 160 indexed citations
7.
Ammer, Christian, Peter Annighöfer, Peter Biber, et al.. (2017). Tree ring wood density of Scots pine and European beech lower in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management. 400. 363–374. 57 indexed citations
8.
Rötzer, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Tree species and size drive water consumption of beech/spruce forests - a simulation study highlighting growth under water limitation. Plant and Soil. 418(1-2). 337–356. 37 indexed citations
10.
Pretzsch, Hans, Taryn L. Bauerle, Karl‐Heinz Häberle, et al.. (2016). Tree diameter growth after root trenching in a mature mixed stand of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]). Trees. 30(5). 1761–1773. 28 indexed citations
11.
Pretzsch, Hans & Gerhard Schütze. (2015). Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure, density, and yield of forest stands. European Journal of Forest Research. 135(1). 1–22. 146 indexed citations
12.
Pretzsch, Hans, Peter Biber, Gerhard Schütze, Enno Uhl, & Thomas Rötzer. (2014). Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nature Communications. 5(1). 4967–4967. 458 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Pretzsch, Hans & Gerhard Schütze. (2014). Size-structure dynamics of mixed versus pure forest stands. Forest Systems. 23(3). 560–572. 31 indexed citations
14.
Pretzsch, Hans, Peter Biber, Gerhard Schütze, & Kamil Bielak. (2013). Changes of forest stand dynamics in Europe. Facts from long-term observational plots and their relevance for forest ecology and management. Forest Ecology and Management. 316. 65–77. 59 indexed citations
15.
Rı́o, Miren del, Gerhard Schütze, & Hans Pretzsch. (2013). Temporal variation of competition and facilitation in mixed species forests inCentralEurope. Plant Biology. 16(1). 166–176. 113 indexed citations
16.
Pretzsch, Hans, Enno Uhl, Peter Biber, Gerhard Schütze, & K. David Coates. (2012). Change of allometry between coarse root and shoot of Lodgepole pine (Pinus contortaDOUGL. ex. LOUD) along a stress gradient in the sub-boreal forest zone of British Columbia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 27(6). 532–544. 27 indexed citations
17.
Pretzsch, Hans, Gerhard Schütze, & Enno Uhl. (2012). Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: evidence of stress release by inter‐specific facilitation. Plant Biology. 15(3). 483–495. 463 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Pretzsch, Hans & Gerhard Schütze. (2008). Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. European Journal of Forest Research. 128(2). 183–204. 229 indexed citations
19.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026