Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic
2015601 citationsMaria Fossheim, Raul Primicerio et al.profile →
Climate change alters the structure of arctic marine food webs due to poleward shifts of boreal generalists
2015342 citationsSusanne Kortsch, Raul Primicerio et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Aschan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Aschan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Aschan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Aschan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Aschan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Aschan. The network helps show where Michaela Aschan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michaela Aschan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michaela Aschan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michaela Aschan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michaela Aschan. Michaela Aschan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aschan, Michaela, et al.. (2004). Management of the shrimp fishery (Pandalus borealis) in the Barents Sea and Spitsbergen area. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
Aschan, Michaela, Bjørn Ådlandsvik, & Sigurd Tjelmeland. (2000). Spatial and temporal patterns in recruitment of shrimp Pandalus borealis in the Barents Sea. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).3 indexed citations
Aschan, Michaela & Knut Sunnanå. (1997). Evaluation of the Norwegian shrimp surveys conducted in the Barents Sea and the Svalbard area 1980- 1997. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).17 indexed citations
16.
Aschan, Michaela, et al.. (1996). Catch statistics and life history of shrimp, Pandalus borealis, in the Jan Mayen area. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).2 indexed citations
17.
Aschan, Michaela, et al.. (1993). Results of Norwegian and Russian investigations of shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in the Barents Sea and Svalbard area in 1992. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).3 indexed citations
Aschan, Michaela. (1990). Changes in softbottom macrofauna communities along environmental gradients. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 27(4). 329–336.19 indexed citations
20.
Aschan, Michaela. (1988). Soft bottom macrobenthos in a Baltic archipelago: Spatial variation and optimal sampling strategy. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 25(2). 153–164.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.