Michael Tye

112 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

Consciousness, Color, and Content 2000 · 642 citations
6421995202620052015250500750

Peers

Michael Tye
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • History and Philosophy of Science 883
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.2k
  • Philosophy 1.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Social Psychology 635
Replace Mohan Matthen with:
Mohan Matthen Canada
Gareth Evans United Kingdom
Bence Nánay Belgium
Berit Brogaard United States
Karen Neander United States
Nicholas Shea United Kingdom
Daniel D. Hutto Australia
Fred Adams United States
Erik Myin Belgium
Tom Froese Mexico
Michael Tye relative to Mohan Matthen Canada Mohan Matthen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Mohan Matthen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tye. The network helps show where Michael Tye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Tye Line = papers co-authored together Michael Tye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ten Problems of Consciousness
Hit paper breakdown →
1995750
2
Consciousness, Color, and Content
Hit paper breakdown →
2000642
3 2002136
4 2003121
5 201179
6 199969
7
Consciousness and Persons: Unity and Identity
200366
8 199564
9 199461
10 200152
11 201251
12 200850
13 199049
14 201348
15 200847
16 198442
17 199841
18 200640
19 200337
20 201637

About Michael Tye

Michael Tye is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (47 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (21 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (11 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (883 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.2k citations), Philosophy (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k citations) and Social Psychology (635 citations). Michael Tye has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Brian Cutter, R. M. Sainsbury, Ned Block, Alex Byrne, Brian P. McLaughlin, Daniel C. Dennett, Richard Fumerton, Alastair Hannay, Norman Malcolm and D. M. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review and Philosophical Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026