Mohan Matthen
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- André AriewUlrike LemkeNatalie A. PhillipsSophia E. KramerThomas LunnerGraham NaylorLarry E. HumesMary Rudner
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (13 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (11 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBehavioral and Brain SciencesThe Philosophical Review
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mohan Matthen
75 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 639
- History and Philosophy of Science 489
- Speech and Hearing 468
- Sociology and Political Science 351
Countries citing papers authored by Mohan Matthen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohan Matthen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohan Matthen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohan Matthen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohan Matthen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohan Matthen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohan Matthen. The network helps show where Mohan Matthen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohan Matthen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohan Matthen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohan Matthen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mohan Matthen. Mohan Matthen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Art, Pleasure, Value: Reframing the Questions | 4 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Philosophy of biology | 10 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 192 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Mohan Matthen
Mohan Matthen is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (13 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (11 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (489 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations) and Speech and Hearing (468 citations). Mohan Matthen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include André Ariew, Ulrike Lemke, Natalie A. Phillips, Sophia E. Kramer, Thomas Lunner, Graham Naylor, Larry E. Humes, Mary Rudner, Brent Edwards and Kelly L. Tremblay. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.