Michael Silverthorne
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 4
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Co-authors
- Samuel Pufendorf (1 shared paper)James Tully (1 shared paper)Jonathan Israël (1 shared paper)David Harvey (1 shared paper)Mary Amanda Stewart (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of the Classical Tradition (1 paper)Hume studies (1 paper)Érudit (Université de Montréal) (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Silverthorne
6 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Philosophy 49
- Archeology 4
- Political Science and International Relations 66
- Law 16
- History 13
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Silverthorne
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Silverthorne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Silverthorne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Silverthorne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Silverthorne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Silverthorne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Silverthorne. The network helps show where Michael Silverthorne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael Silverthorne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law | 1991 | 76 |
| 2 | Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment : The Writings of Gershom Carmichael | 2002 | 25 |
| 3 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 4 | Spinoza: Theological-Political Treatise | 2007 | 5 |
| 5 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 7 | Education for Life: Correspondence and Writings on Religion and Practical Philosophy | 2015 | 1 |
About Michael Silverthorne
Michael Silverthorne is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), American Literature and Culture (1 paper), Religious Education and Schools (1 paper), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (49 citations), Archeology (4 citations), Political Science and International Relations (66 citations), Law (16 citations) and History (13 citations). Michael Silverthorne has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Pufendorf, James Tully, Jonathan Israël, David Harvey and Mary Amanda Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of the Classical Tradition, Hume studies, Érudit (Université de Montréal), Cambridge University Press eBooks and Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.