Simone Goyard-Fabre
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Law top 5%
- History top 10%
Simone Goyard-Fabre
22 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Political Science and International Relations 55
- Sociology and Political Science 34
- Philosophy 28
- Law 25
- History 21
Countries citing papers authored by Simone Goyard-Fabre
This map shows the geographic impact of Simone Goyard-Fabre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simone Goyard-Fabre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simone Goyard-Fabre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simone Goyard-Fabre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simone Goyard-Fabre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simone Goyard-Fabre. The network helps show where Simone Goyard-Fabre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simone Goyard-Fabre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simone Goyard-Fabre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simone Goyard-Fabre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simone Goyard-Fabre. Simone Goyard-Fabre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | L'interminable querelle du contrat social | 0 |
| 2 | Re-penser la pensée du droit : les doctrines occidentales modernes au tribunal de la raison interrogative-critique | 0 |
| 3 | L'État au XXe siècle : regards sur la pensée juridique et politique du monde occidental | 2 |
| 4 | Philosophie critique et raison juridique | 1 |
| 5 | Critique de la raison juridique | 5 |
| 6 | Les embarras philosophiques du droit naturel | 1 |
| 7 | Politique et philosophie dans l'œuvre de Jean-Jacques Rousseau | 3 |
| 8 | Jean Bodin (1529-1596) et sa politique philosophique | 2 |
| 9 | Les principes philosophiques du droit politique moderne | 7 |
| 10 | La philosophie du droit de Kant | 10 |
| 11 | Éléments de philosophie politique | 0 |
| 12 | John Locke et la raison raisonnable | 4 |
| 13 | Exposé du droit universel = Juris universi distributio | 0 |
| 14 | Le citoyen ou les fondements de la politique | 8 |
| 15 | Montesquieu adversaire de Hobbes | 4 |
| 16 | Nietzsche et la question politique | 4 |
| 17 | Kant et le problème du droit | 3 |
| 18 | Le droit et la loi dans la philosophie de Thomas Hobbes | 5 |
| 19 | La philosophie du droit de Montesquieu | 5 |
| 20 | La Philosophie des Lumières en France | 0 |
About Simone Goyard-Fabre
Simone Goyard-Fabre is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 37 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (11 papers), Legal and Social Philosophy (7 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (25 citations), Philosophy (28 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (55 citations). Simone Goyard-Fabre has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Hobbes, Denis Diderot, Jean Bodin and Jean‐Jacques Rousseau. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Dialogue and Revue de métaphysique et de morale.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.